Abstract:There is a growing recognition of the importance of conservation beyond protected areas, in spaces of human-wildlife coexistence. Negative human-wildlife interactions are a key challenge, but a better understanding of the forms of tolerance and mutual accommodation would be useful for coadaptation toward coexistence. To date, however, studies of human-wildlife often have been limited by a largely quantified positivist epistemology, which elides the diverse cultural and ecological contexts which enable tolerance and coexistence between humans and wildlife to develop and adhere. In Gudalur, a plantation landscape in South India, about 150 elephants share space with a quarter of a million people. Using a quantified survey coupled with ethnographic fieldwork, we aim to better understand human diversity and tolerance of elephants that allows for coexistence. We find a marked difference between communities, with ethnicity being a better predictor of tolerance than the more tangible socio-economic or geographic variables such as income, education, land holding or cropping patterns. Using qualitative data, we identify three socio-cultural variables that are relevant to tolerance–a shared history of living with elephants, mode of subsistence and type of agricultural crops, and most importantly, ontology or the fundamental understanding of “what is an elephant?” Hunter-gatherer conceptualisations of elephants as “other-than-human persons” prove to be the ontological stance best suited to coexistence, as it allows for elephant individuality and interpersonal negotiations of shared space, which is limited in other world-views, including the worshiping of elephants as Ganesha, the elephant headed deity in the Hindu Pantheon. Having identified some important differences among ethnic communities in human-elephant interactions, we consider the implications of the research for improving the management and practice of human-wildlife coexistence not only in the Nilgiri region but within the broader context of conservation and development.

Understanding the prospects of human-wildlife coexistence: a conceptual framework

Myths and assumptions about human‐wildlife conflict and coexistence

The wildlife attitude-acceptability framework's potential to inform human dimensions of wildlife science and practice

Understanding human-wildlife conflict in Nepal and its mitigating measures

A Framework for Estimating Human-Wildlife Conflict Probabilities Conditional on Species Occupancy

Bibliometric analysis of human–wildlife conflict: From conflict to coexistence

Avoiding negativity bias: Towards a positive psychology of human–wildlife relationships

Eliciting community‐preferred policy alternatives for achieving workable coexistence in a human‐dominated landscape: Insights from Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Rural livelihoods, community-based conservation, and human–wildlife conflict: Scope for synergies?

Trends in human dimensions of wildlife at Cornell University: 50 years and counting

Quantifying Human Well‐being for Sustainability Research and Policy

Coexistence and Culture: Understanding Human Diversity and Tolerance in Human-Elephant Interactions

A systems approach to planning for human‐wildlife coexistence: The case of people and jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal

People in a Biodiverse Region Experienced Varying Types and Timing of Conflict With Multiple Wildlife Species

Into the wild: uncertain frontiers and sustainable human-nature interactions

Introduction: Human-nature interactions through a multispecies lens

Transparency and adaptability aid in realigning the complexity of objectives, approaches, and systems in human-wildlife coexistence research

Exploring Routes to Coexistence: Developing and Testing a Human–Elephant Conflict-Management Framework for African Elephant-Range Countries

Unpacking the challenges of wildlife governance in community‐based conservation programs to promote human–wildlife coexistence

Coexistence and the SDGs: an argument for a rights-based approach to human-wildlife conflict in India

Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research