Estimation of Aromatic Secondary Organic Aerosol Using a Molecular Tracer—A Chemical Transport Model Assessment

Jie Zhang,Xiao He,Yaqin Gao,Shuhui Zhu,Shengao Jing,Hongli Wang,Jian Zhen Yu,Qi Ying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03670

2021-09-15

Abstract:A modified community multiscale air quality model, which can simulate the regional distributions of 2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxopentanoic acid (DHOPA), a marker species for monoaromatic secondary organic aerosol (SOA), was applied to assess the applicability of using the DHOPA to aromatic SOA mass ratio (fSOA) from smog chamber experiments to estimate aromatic SOA during a three-week wintertime air quality campaign in urban Shanghai. The modeled daily DHOPA concentrations based on the chamber-derived mass yields agree well with the organic marker field measurements (R = 0.79; MFB = 0.152; and MFE = 0.440). Two-thirds of the DHOPA are from the oxidation of ARO1 (lumped less-reactive aromatic species; mostly toluene), with the rest from ARO2 (lumped more-reactive aromatic species; mostly xylenes). Modeled DHOPA is mainly in the particle phase under ambient organic aerosol (OA) loading but could exhibit significant gas-particle partitioning when a higher estimation of the DHOPA vapor pressure is used. The modeled fSOA shows a strong dependence on the OA loading when only semivolatile aromatic SOA components are included in the fSOA calculations. However, this OA dependence becomes weaker when non-volatile oligomers and dicarbonyl SOA products are considered. A constant fSOA value of ∼0.002 is determined when all aromatic SOA components are included, which is a factor of 2 smaller than the commonly applied chamber-based fSOA value of 0.004 for toluene. This model-derived fSOA value does not show much spatial variation and is not sensitive to alternative estimates of DHOPA vapor pressures and SOA yields, and thus provides an appropriate scaling factor to assess aromatic SOA from DHOPA measurements. This result helps refine the quantification of SOA attributable to monoaromatic hydrocarbons in urban environments and thereby facilitates the evaluation of control measures targeting these specific precursors.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c03670.Summertime DHOPA and fSOA; model performance of DHOPA during the summertime in 2012; model evaluation of DHOPA with 15 sites across China during the summertime in 2012; average DHOPA/aromatic SOA ratio; regional distribution of 2012 summer average; regional distribution of modeled DHOPA from each formation pathway; other species in ARO1 and ARO2 and their impacts on DHOPA yields and fSOA; fSOA and mass yield (α) of DHOPA from aromatics photooxidation reaction under high-NOx; SOA yield curves for detailed ARO1; SOA two-product model parameters; list of base case and sensitivity CMAQ; meteorology model performance and comparison with proposed benchmarks; distribution of fSOA values; and fractional and monthly contributions to modeled monthly average DHOPA (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental