Abstract:In clinical research, the gold standard level of evidence is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). The availability of nonrandomized retrospective data is growing; however, a primary concern of analyzing such data is comparability of the treatment groups with respect to confounding variables. Propensity score matching (PSM) aims to equate treatment groups with respect to measured baseline covariates to achieve a comparison with reduced selection bias. It is a valuable statistical methodology that mimics the RCT, and it may create an "apples to apples" comparison while reducing bias due to confounding. PSM can improve the quality of anesthesia research and broaden the range of research opportunities. PSM is not necessarily a magic bullet for poor-quality data, but rather may allow the researcher to achieve balanced treatment groups similar to a RCT when high-quality observational data are available. PSM may be more appealing than the common approach of including confounders in a regression model because it allows for a more intuitive analysis of a treatment effect between 2 comparable groups.We present 5 steps that anesthesiologists can use to successfully implement PSM in their research with an example from the 2015 Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a validated, annually updated surgery and anesthesia pediatric database. The first step of PSM is to identify its feasibility with regard to the data at hand and ensure availability of data on any potential confounders. The second step is to obtain the set of propensity scores from a logistic regression model with treatment group as the outcome and the balancing factors as predictors. The third step is to match patients in the 2 treatment groups with similar propensity scores, balancing all factors. The fourth step is to assess the success of the matching with balance diagnostics, graphically or analytically. The fifth step is to apply appropriate statistical methodology using the propensity-matched data to compare outcomes among treatment groups.PSM is becoming an increasingly more popular statistical methodology in medical research. It often allows for improved evaluation of a treatment effect that may otherwise be invalid due to a lack of balance between the 2 treatment groups with regard to confounding variables. PSM may increase the level of evidence of a study and in turn increases the strength and generalizability of its results. Our step-by-step approach provides a useful strategy for anesthesiologists to implement PSM in their future research.

Application and comparison of generalized propensity score matching versus pairwise propensity score matching.

Analysis of survival data with non-proportional hazards: A comparison of propensity score weighted methods

Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method.

Covariate-adjusted Survival Analyses in Propensity-Score Matched Samples: Imputing Potential Time-to-event Outcomes.

Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates

Balance Diagnostics after Propensity Score Matching.

[Application of Propensity Score Matching in the Design of an Epidemiological Study].

Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Comparison and Application of Matching in Propensity Score Method and Mahalanobis Distance Method

Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Survival of Clinically Diagnosed Early-Stage Lung Cancer and Biopsy-Proven Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments

Comparison of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer Using Observational Data Revisited: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: imputing potential time-to-event outcomes

Comparing Propensity Score-Based Methods in Estimating the Treatment Effects: A Simulation Study

Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Matched-Pair and Propensity Score Comparisons of Outcomes of Patients with Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Resection or Stereotactic Radiosurgery