Abstract:Background: The combination of sodium bisulfite treatment with highly-parallel sequencing is a common method for quantifying DNA methylation across the genome. The power to detect between-group differences in DNA methylation using bisulfite-sequencing approaches is influenced by both experimental (e.g. read depth, missing data and sample size) and biological (e.g. mean level of DNA methylation and difference between groups) parameters. There is, however, no consensus about the optimal thresholds for filtering bisulfite sequencing data with implications for the reproducibility of findings in epigenetic epidemiology. Results: We used a large reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) dataset to assess the distribution of read depth across DNA methylation sites and the extent of missing data. To investigate how various study variables influence power to identify DNA methylation differences between groups, we developed a framework for simulating bisulfite sequencing data. As expected, sequencing read depth, group size, and the magnitude of DNA methylation difference between groups all impacted upon statistical power. The influence on power was not dependent on one specific parameter, but reflected the combination of study-specific variables. As a resource to the community, we have developed a tool, POWEREDBiSeq, which utilizes our simulation framework to predict study-specific power for the identification of DNAm differences between groups, taking into account user-defined read depth filtering parameters and the minimum sample size per group. Conclusions: Our data-driven approach highlights the importance of filtering bisulfite-sequencing data by minimum read depth and illustrates how the choice of threshold is influenced by the specific study design and the expected differences between groups being compared. The POWEREDBiSeq tool, which can be applied to different types of bisulfite sequencing data (e.g. RRBS, whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), targeted bisulfite sequencing and amplicon-based bisulfite sequencing), can help users identify the level of data filtering needed to optimize power and aims to improve the reproducibility of bisulfite sequencing studies.

BSXplorer: analytical framework for exploratory analysis of BS-seq data

Genome-scale sequence data processing and epigenetic analysis of DNA methylation]

Analyzing single-cell bisulfite sequencing data with

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Alignment Software for Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing Data

Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications

BS-RNA: An efficient mapping and annotation tool for RNA bisulfite sequencing data

WBSA: Web Service for Bisulfite Sequencing Data Analysis

msgbsR: An R package for analysing methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing data

Objective and Comprehensive Evaluation of Bisulfite Short Read Mapping Tools.

Kismeth: Analyzer of Plant Methylation States Through Bisulfite Sequencing

Approaches for the Analysis and Interpretation of Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing Data

EPIC-TABSAT: analysis tool for targeted bisulfite sequencing experiments and array-based methylation studies

Valibs: A Visual Aligner for Bisulfite Sequences

PCBS: an R package for fast and accurate analysis of bisulfite sequencing data

BS-virus-finder: Virus Integration Calling Using Bisulfite Sequencing Data

A Framework for Analyzing DNA Methylation Data from Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip

Genome-wide base-resolution mapping of DNA methylation in single cells using single-cell bisulfite sequencing (scBS-seq)

Characterizing the properties of bisulfite sequencing data: maximizing power and sensitivity to identify between-group differences in DNA methylation

Semi-supervised peak calling with SPAN and JBR genome browser

RnBeads 2.0: comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data

A New Approach to Decode DNA Methylome and Genomic Variants Simultaneously from Double Strand Bisulfite Sequencing.