Effects of Perioperative Pain Intervention on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients with Partial Resection of Lung Cancer
Huang Yahong,Huang Cuijuan,Ba Zhiqiong,Chen Xiumei,Yahong Huang,Cuijuan Huang,Zhiqiong Ba,Xiumei Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojtr.2021.93008
2021-01-01
Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
Abstract:Objective: To explore the effect of perioperative pain intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients who underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of lung cancer. Methods: From January 2021 to May 2021, 100 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic partial lung resection in Cardiopulmonary Department II of Cancer Center in our hospital were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table . Routine nursing after surgery was used in both groups, the observation group was given perioperative pain intervention nursing on the basis of routine nursing, and the postoperative pain (6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h after operation), the rate of out-of-bed activity within 24 h after operation, lien chest tube time, the incidence of postoperative complications, the influence of pain on daily life, the satisfaction of patients with pain control methods and pain education and the satisfaction of discharged patients were observed and recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in general data (age, sex, educational level, course of disease, TNM stage of lung cancer, maximum diameter of tumor (CM), surgical site) between the two groups (P > 0.05); the NRS scores of the observation group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); after operation, the rate of 24 h out-of-bed activity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the lien chest tube time was shorter than the control group, and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); after operation, the effect level of pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of pain health education, pain control methods and discharged patients w as higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative pain intervention can effectively relieve postoperative pain state of patients, promote patients’ early out of bed and conducive to lung expansion, shorten the time of lien chest tube, reduce postoperative complications and the impact of pain on daily life, help patients recover as soon as possible, and improve the satisfaction of patients for medical treatment.
English Else