Abstract:Increased risk of wildfires is often highlighted in media coverage of climate change in the Nordic countries. How an increased risk is reflected in the concerns and adaptive measures within the most likely affected communities is nevertheless not known. This study investigates concerns and adaptation to wildfires in a rural community in south-eastern Sweden. The comparatively dry study area has a history of frequent but often low-consequence wildfires and is projected to experience Sweden's largest increase in severe fire weather towards 2100. Through narratives, this study elucidates potential wildfire concerns in this area and motivations behind adaptation measures. The narratives are compared to a physical causal network extracted from the literature on fires and their consequences in the region. Residents foresee an increased wildfire risk but do not consider it a threat to the future well-being of the community. Forest owners and homeowners express low commitment in preventive or adaptive measures. Instead, contrasting the reality of the twentieth century, the fire service is currently considered to be responsible for both preventing and suppressing fires. This attitude is attributed to the lack of severe implications from the generally well-managed fires in the region. Actions for prevention and adaptation seem triggered by media attention or experience from real high-consequence events occurring elsewhere, rather than local wildfire occurrence or climate change projections.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand how a rural community in southeastern Sweden copes with and adapts to the wildfire risk, and how these risks change in the context of expected climate change. Specifically, the research aims to explore the following questions: 1. **What are the main causal factors of wildfires and their consequences in the region?** - Based on previous research, identify the key factors that lead to the occurrence of wildfires and their consequences. 2. **How might the community develop considering the local projected climate change by 2100?** - Explore the impact of climate change on the future of the community, especially the change in wildfire risk. 3. **How do the community's experiences and memories of wildfires shape local concerns?** - Through the narratives of residents, understand how past wildfire events affect current concerns and attitudes. 4. **How does the expected climate change increase the perceived risk and promote the adoption of adaptation measures?** - Analyze the expected impact of climate change on wildfire risk and how this impact affects the community's adaptive behavior. The purpose of the research is to reveal the concerns about wildfire risk within the community and the reasons behind them through these specific questions, and to understand the driving forces for promoting adaptation measures. In addition, the research also compares the concerns and adaptation measures within the community with the physical causal network in the scientific literature to evaluate whether these concerns and attitudes are consistent with scientific research. ### Overview of methods The research adopts two methods: 1. **Narrative analysis**: Through interviews with forest owners, volunteers, residents and civil servants, collect narratives about wildfire response, the environment of the place of residence and the future development of the community. 2. **Physical causal network**: Based on scientific literature, construct a physical causal network of wildfire risk to show the factors that lead to the occurrence of wildfires and their consequences. ### Research area The research area includes three municipalities in Sweden: Högsby, Mönsterås and Oskarshamn. Historically, wildfires have occurred frequently in this area, but most of the consequences of wildfires are minor. However, this area is expected to experience the largest growth in severe fire weather in Sweden. ### Main findings 1. **Community's awareness of wildfire risk**: - Residents foresee an increase in wildfire risk, but do not consider it a threat to the future well - being of the community. - Forest owners and homeowners have a low commitment to prevention and adaptation measures. - In contrast, the fire department is considered to have the primary responsibility for preventing and extinguishing wildfires. 2. **Drivers of adaptation measures**: - Prevention and adaptation measures are often triggered by media attention or high - consequence events that occur elsewhere, rather than by local wildfire events or climate change projections. 3. **Comparison between physical causal network and community narratives**: - There are certain differences between the community's concerns and adaptive attitudes and the physical causal network in the scientific literature, which indicates that the community's perception of wildfire risk may be influenced by past experiences and media reports. ### Conclusion This research emphasizes the importance of the community's perception of wildfire risk and adaptive behavior, and points out that increasing public awareness and participation in wildfire risk is crucial for the effective implementation of adaptation measures. The research results are of great significance for guiding authorities to formulate adaptation measures, especially in high - risk areas that have not experienced high - consequence events.

"This community will grow" — little concern for future wildfires in a dry and increasingly hotter Swedish rural community

Uplifting local ecological knowledge as part of adaptation pathways to wildfire risk reduction: A case study in Montseny, Catalonia (Spain)

The fire weather in Europe: large-scale trends towards higher danger

Outreach Programs, Peer Pressure, and Common Sense: What Motivates Homeowners to Mitigate Wildfire Risk?

What can we do when the smoke rolls in? An exploratory qualitative analysis of the impacts of rural wildfire smoke on mental health and wellbeing, and opportunities for adaptation

Synergistic and antagonistic effects of land use and non-native species on community responses to climate change

Governance drivers hinder and support a paradigm shift in wildfire risk management in Italy

A bridge over troubled water: A contextual analysis of social vulnerability to climate change in a riverine landscape in south-east Norway

Climatic and vegetational controls of Holocene wildfire regimes in the boreal forest of northern Fennoscandia

Scientists' warning on extreme wildfire risks to water supply

Living on a flammable planet: interdisciplinary, cross-scalar and varied cultural lessons, prospects and challenges

Perceptions on and impacts of environmental changes under multiple stressors: a case study from two communities in northern Fennoscandia

Fire Safety Disparities in Sweden: Sociodemographic Influences and the Impact of Societal Protection on Personal Fire Prevention Measures

Filling the void: Rural disaster volunteerism during the Swedish wildfires of 2018

Wildfire influences species assemblage and habitat utilisation of boreal wildlife after more than a decade in northern Sweden

Projected changes in forest fire season, the number of fires, and burnt area in Fennoscandia by 2100

Community Risk and Resilience to Wildfires: Rethinking the Complex Human–Climate–Fire Relationship in High-Latitude Regions

Global wildfire activity re-visited

Fire severity as a key determinant of aboveground and belowground biological community recovery in managed even‐aged boreal forests

In temperate Europe, fire is already here: The case of The Netherlands