Flow cytometric investigation and comparison of Synechococcus spp. pico-, nano- and microplankton in the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions during the summer period of 2019

Ali Muzaffer FeyzioğluYahya TerziRafet Çağrı ÖztürkErsan Başarİlknur YıldızErtuğrul Ağırbaşa Department of Marine Science and Technology Engineering,Faculty of Marine Sciences,Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon,Türkiyeb Department of Fisheries Technology Engineering,Faculty of Marine Sciences,Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon,Türkiyec Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering,Faculty of Marine Sciences,Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon,Türkiyed Institute of Marine Sciences and Technology,Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon,Türkiyee Department of Marine Biology,Faculty of Fisheries,Recep Tayyip Erdogan University,Rize,Türkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2023.2299995
2024-02-02
Marine Biology Research
Abstract:In the present study, Synechococcus spp pico-, nano- and microplankton community compositions in the Arctic and Antarctic surface coastal waters were compared during the summer of 2019 using flow cytometry. The average surface water temperatures in Antarctica and the Arctic were −0.29 ± 0.28°C and 3.71 ± 0.71°C, respectively. While plankton abundance in Antarctica exhibited a relative increase with temperature, plankton abundance in the Arctic exhibited a relative decrease with temperature. However, no significant correlation was found between plankton abundance and temperature. Synechococcus spp cell abundance dominated in both polar regions, followed by picoeukaryotes, microautotrophs and nanoeukaryotes. Overall, plankton abundance across sampling sites was highly variable. In Antarctica, the abundance of Synechococcus spp, picoeukaryotes, nanoeukaryotes and microautotrophs were the highest in S4 (151,400 cells/ml), S1 (2180 cells/ml), S2 (1080 cells/ml) and S4 (6100 cells/ml), respectively. On the other hand, the most abundant stations in the Arctic in terms of Synechococcus spp., picoeukaryotes, nanoeukaryotes and microautotrophs were N2 (19600 cells/ml), N3 (6400 cells/ml), N3 (500 cells/ml) and N4 (6100 cells/ml), respectively. While Synechococcus spp. and nanoeukaryote abundance were higher in Antarctica, only Synechococcus spp abundance was significantly higher in Antarctica.
ecology,marine & freshwater biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?