Assessing the realism of clean energy projections

Fatemeh Rostami,Piera Patrizio,Loreano Jimenez Esteller,Carlos Pozo Fernandez,Niall MacDowell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee00747f

IF: 32.5

2024-06-27

Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract:Although pivotal in the climate change discourse, integrated assessment models (IAMs) often face criticism for their overly optimistic projections. In this contribution, we critically examine IAM limitations in the context of clean energy technologies and critical materials. IAMs project a very substantial increase in clean energy technology deployment by 2050. When considering diverse technology types and their material requirements – information missing from IAMs – we find that this may represent a substantial 571-fold surge in selenium demand and a 531-fold increase in gallium, figures that seem difficult to achieve. This challenges not only the capacity of material reserves but also the rate at which these can be produced. To address this gap, we propose establishing a direct link between industrial assets and required materials through simple constraints on material availability. We illustrate the capabilities of this approach by estimating the achievable clean energy capacities by 2050. We find potential shortages in the capacity developed for clean energy technologies compared to IAM projections that may result in deviations from the Paris agreement target by 0.06–0.95 °C. Therefore, incorporating material constraints and technological diversity into IAMs presents a valuable opportunity to enhance their predictive accuracy and guide evidence-based policymaking. Including these aspects in IAMs and decision-support tools will make them more useful in shaping a sustainable yet realistic energy sector.

energy & fuels,chemistry, multidisciplinary,engineering, chemical,environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the overly optimistic predictions of Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) regarding the deployment of Clean Energy Technologies (CETs). Specifically, the paper points out that current IAMs often overlook the actual constraints of material demand and the diversity of technology types when predicting the deployment of clean energy technologies, leading to a significant gap between the predictions and reality. By analyzing the demand for 36 critical materials and comparing it with the existing material production capacity, the paper finds that the growth rate of demand for many materials may be difficult to achieve. For example, the demand for selenium may increase by 571 times, and the demand for gallium may increase by 531 times, which seems difficult to attain. Therefore, the paper suggests incorporating material availability constraints and technological innovation diversity into IAMs to improve the accuracy of predictions and support evidence-based policy-making. Through this improvement, it is possible to better assess the actual achievable clean energy capacity and incorporate these factors into decision support tools, thereby shaping a sustainable and realistic energy sector. In summary, the paper aims to reveal the limitations of IAMs and propose an improved method to address these shortcomings.