Abstract:We attempt to bridge the value – action paradox inhibiting environmental action by drawing upon work cast within conservation psychology to identify mechanisms by which the processes driving action can be shaped to achieve more sustainable outcomes. The shift toward a more mutualistic orientation with nature suggests the possibility of increasing success of treatments aimed at manipulating the endogenous psychological process (i.e., attitudes, knowledge, efficacy, norms) stemming from value orientation. While empirical evidence illustrates that values can be slow to change, the psychological processes situated higher within the cognitive hierarchy are more susceptible to manipulation. The need for behavioral change is imminent. While developed societies have, for the most part, modernized to the extent basic human needs are amply satisfied, the economic development that has accompanied modernization has coupled economic growth with an unsustainable consumption of natural resources and rising emissions. An increasing number of researchers and activists have called for a transition to a global steady-state economy. We suggest that shifting societal values present an opportunity for modern society to capitalize on humans’ increasing empathy for the natural world and to act in more sustainable ways. Research illustrates that those expressing a stronger affinity toward nature (e.g., mutualists) are more inclined to agree with statements suggesting that environmental protection should be prioritized over economic growth and that climate change is primarily driven by the burning of fossil fuels. Unfortunately, as it presently stands, those most inclined to express this sentiment (i.e., those reporting higher incomes, more years of formal education, and residing in urbanized environments) are also more likely to act in ways that contribute to climate change (e.g., car usage, air travel, household energy use). It is a troubling paradox given they have greater capacity for reducing their ecological footprint. With human values shifting toward a more empathetic orientation toward nature, our review implies that now more than ever, efforts to manipulate elements of the cognitive hierarchy are likely to result in behavioral change that can minimize many anthropogenic drivers of climate change.

Now is the time for conservationists to stand up for social justice

Exploring the emergence of a tipping point for conservation with increased recognition of social considerations

Re-centering social justice in conservation science: Progressive policies, methods, and practices

Now is the time for academics to think and act beyond academia

Modernity and the western value-action paradox: contributions from conservation psychology

Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation

Why Conservation Needs Religion

Distinguished primatologist address-moving from advocacy to activism: Changing views of primate field research and conservation over the past 40 years

Conservation and human rights: The public commitments of international conservation organizations

The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation

Introduction: Human-nature interactions through a multispecies lens

Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change

Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation

Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity

Reclaiming Hope in Extinction Storytelling

Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan

Reframing conservation audiences from individuals to social beings

A Call for Conservation Scientists to Empirically Study the Effects of Human Population Policies on Biodiversity Loss

Rethinking entrenched narratives about protected areas and human wellbeing in the Global South

The positive impact of conservation action

Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future