Comparison of soil extractions by 0.01M CaCl2, by EUF and by some conventional extraction procedures

V. J. G. Houba,I. Novozamsky,A. W. M. Huybregts,J. J. van der Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02375149
IF: 4.993
1986-10-01
Plant and Soil
Abstract:The extractive powers of different extraction procedures (Electro-Ultrafiltration, 0.01M CaCl2 and standard Dutch methods) were compared mutually for a limited number of nutrients in soil samples from 21 locations. The results showed that for almost all parameters under study (Na, K, Mg, Mn, P, N) the methods are interchangeable. Drawbacks of the EUF technique are lower reproducibility of the results, laboriousness and high cost. Moreover, the extraction of exchangeable forms of Mn and Mg with this technique was incomplete. Extraction with 0.01M CaCl2 seems recommendable due to the simplicity of the analytical procedure giving sufficient information for practical soil-analytical purposes.
plant sciences,soil science,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?