Factors Associated with Teacher Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis

Sijing Zhou,Gavin R. Slemp,Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x
IF: 8.24
2024-06-15
Educational Psychology Review
Abstract:Teacher wellbeing has received widespread and increasing global attention over the last decade due to high teacher turnover, growing teacher shortages, and the goal of improving the quality of teaching and student performance. No review has yet sought to undertake a cumulative quantitative assessment of the literature pertaining to teacher wellbeing. Using meta-analysis, we address this gap by systematically examining the relative strength of key antecedents, consequences, and correlates of teacher wellbeing, using the Job Demands-Resources theory as a guide to positioning factors in the nomological network. Following PRISMA guidelines, our systematic search yielded 173 eligible studies for inclusion ( N = 89,876). Results showed that hope, autonomous motivation, psychological capital and job competencies were the top four strongest positive predictors of overall wellbeing, whereas neuroticism and disengagement coping were the top two strongest negative predictors. Occupational commitment was the strongest positive consequence of overall wellbeing, and turnover intentions were the strongest negative consequence. Burnout and work engagement were the strongest correlates of overall wellbeing. We also found that some effects were moderated by factors such as whether teachers were in-service or pre-service, and the educational setting (e.g., K-12, initial teacher education). Our review provides a useful empirical resource that may help guide practice in terms of how teachers, school leaders, and policy makers can support teacher wellbeing.
psychology, educational
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the lack of comprehensive quantitative assessment in the study of teacher well-being. Specifically, although teacher well-being has received widespread attention over the past 10 years, there has not been a systematic cumulative quantitative analysis of the relevant literature. Therefore, this paper systematically examines the key antecedents, consequences, and the relative strength of related factors of teacher well-being through meta-analysis, aiming to fill this research gap. ### Main Research Questions: 1. **Antecedent Factors**: Which factors best predict overall teacher well-being? 2. **Consequence Factors**: Which outcome variables are significantly affected by overall teacher well-being? 3. **Related Factors**: Which factors are closely related to overall teacher well-being? ### Research Background: - **High Teacher Turnover**: Globally, high teacher turnover rates lead to teacher shortages. - **Teaching Quality**: Improving teacher well-being helps enhance teaching quality and student performance. - **Insufficient Existing Research**: Although many studies have explored teacher well-being, there is a lack of systematic quantitative comprehensive assessment. ### Research Methods: - **Meta-Analysis**: Using meta-analysis, systematically integrated 173 eligible studies (total sample size of 89,876). - **Theoretical Framework**: Based on Job Demands-Resources Theory, various factors are classified as antecedents, consequences, and related factors. ### Main Findings: - **Strongest Positive Predictors**: Hope, proactive motivation, psychological capital, and work ability. - **Strongest Negative Predictors**: Neuroticism and negative coping strategies. - **Strongest Positive Consequence**: Occupational commitment. - **Strongest Negative Consequence**: Turnover intention. - **Strongest Related Factors**: Burnout and work engagement. ### Significance: - **Practical Guidance**: Provides empirical resources for teachers, school leaders, and policymakers to help support teacher well-being. - **Theoretical Contribution**: Fills the gap in teacher well-being research, providing a more comprehensive understanding. Through this research, the authors hope to provide strong support for practice and policy-making in the field of education, thereby improving the working environment and quality of life for teachers.