Entomopathogenic pseudomonads can share an insect host with entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria

Maria Zwyssig,Anna Spescha,Tabea Patt,Adrian Belosevic,Ricardo A R Machado,Alice Regaiolo,Christoph Keel,Monika Maurhofer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae028
IF: 11
2024-02-21
The ISME Journal
Abstract:Abstract A promising strategy to overcome limitations in biological control of insect pests is the combined application of entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and nematodes (EPNs) associated with mutualistic bacteria (NABs). Yet, little is known about interspecies interactions such as competition, coexistence, or even cooperation between these entomopathogens when they infect the same insect host. We investigated the dynamics of bacteria-bacteria interactions between the EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and the NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 isolated from the EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5. Bacterial populations were assessed over time in experimental systems of increasing complexity. In vitro, SM5 was outcompeted when CHA0 reached a certain cell density, resulting in the collapse of the SM5 population. In contrast, both bacteria were able to coexist upon haemolymph-injection into Galleria mellonella larvae, as found for three further EPP-NAB combinations. Finally, both bacteria were administered by natural infection routes i.e. orally for CHA0 and nematode-vectored for SM5 resulting in the addition of RS5 to the system. This did not alter bacterial coexistence nor did the presence of the EPP affect nematode reproductive success or progeny virulence. CHA0 benefited from RS5, probably by exploiting access routes formed by the nematodes penetrating the larval gut epithelium. Our results indicate that entomopathogenic pseudomonads are able to share an insect host with entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria without major negative effects on the reproduction of any of the three entomopathogens or the fitness of the nematodes. This suggests that their combination is a promising strategy for biological insect pest control.
ecology,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the possibility and interactions of coexisting two insect pathogens—entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) along with their symbiotic bacteria (NABs) within the same insect host. Specifically, the researchers focus on the following aspects: 1. **Competition and Coexistence**: Whether there is a competitive relationship between EPPs and NABs when infecting the same insect, or if they can coexist. 2. **Synergistic Effects**: Whether there are synergistic effects between EPPs and EPNs along with their NABs, thereby enhancing the biological control effectiveness against insect pests. 3. **Impact Assessment**: Whether the presence of EPPs affects the reproductive capacity and progeny virulence of EPNs. ### Research Background - **Agricultural Pest Problems**: Insect pests cause significant global agricultural yield losses, and the use of traditional chemical pesticides poses environmental and health risks. - **Biological Control**: Biological control is an environmentally friendly alternative method that uses living organisms to control diseases or pests. However, the performance of biological control agents (BCAs) in field applications is unstable and needs improvement. - **Combination Application**: Some studies suggest that the combined application of multiple BCAs can enhance plant protection effectiveness, accelerate pest killing speed, or increase insect mortality rates. However, negative interactions between different BCAs may also affect the outcome. ### Research Methods The researchers used three experimental systems to observe the interactions between EPPs and NABs: 1. **In Vitro Culture**: Observing bacterial growth in liquid culture media. 2. **Injection Infection**: Directly injecting bacteria into the hemolymph of Galleria mellonella larvae. 3. **Natural Infection**: Feeding larvae with EPPs orally, then allowing EPNs to enter the larvae through natural infection routes. ### Main Findings - **In Vitro Culture**: P. protegens CHA0 can inhibit the growth of X. bovienii SM5 at a certain cell density, leading to the collapse of the SM5 population. - **Injection Infection**: In the hemolymph of larvae, CHA0 and SM5 can coexist, and SM5 can resist CHA0's competition in some cases. - **Natural Infection**: Under natural infection conditions, CHA0 and SM5 can coexist, and CHA0 benefits from EPNs' infection, possibly because the channels formed by EPNs penetrating the larval gut epithelium facilitate CHA0 invasion. - **Impact on EPNs**: Although high concentrations of CHA0 have some impact on the biomass of EPNs, there is no significant effect on the reproductive progeny number and virulence of EPNs. - **Transmission Ability**: CHA0 does not spread to new hosts through EPNs. ### Conclusion The research results indicate that EPPs and EPNs along with their NABs can coexist within the same insect host, and EPPs benefit from EPNs' infection without significantly affecting the reproduction or progeny virulence of EPNs. This provides a promising strategy for the biological control of insect pests.