Therapeutic Evaluation of Induction Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Low-risk N Stage

S. Luo,Lina Zhao,Yan Li,M. Shi,N. Su,J. Zang,Yong Zhu,Bingxin Hou,Jian-hua Wang,Qiufang Liu,Xiaohua Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000995
2023-03-07
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Objectives: The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) remains ambiguous in a patient with T3-4N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) according to data from the endemic area of China. Here, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to investigate the value of adding IC to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for T3-4N0-1 NPC from Northwest China. Methods: Data were extracted in 3 hospitals from Northwest China between May 1, 2010 and August 30, 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the endpoints. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Initial propensity matching was conducted with a 1:1 match of IC + CCRT to CCRT. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 108 patients with staging T3-4N0-1 were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 50 months (range: 6 to 118 months). IC followed by CCRT did not significantly improve OS compared with CCRT in the whole cohort (89.5% vs 77.6%, hazard ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16-1.04, P = 0.100). But significantly better OS was found when a well-balanced propensity score-matched cohort was analyzed. Adjusted 4-year OS was 89.5% for IC followed by CCRT versus 71.1% for CCRT (hazard ratio: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, P = 0.027). No significant differences were detected in side effects between the two groups. Conclusion: This study suggested IC followed by CCRT had the potential to further improve OS in patients with T3-4N0-1M0 NPC from Northwest China compared with CCRT. However, prospective studies with a large sample are warranted to confirm the results.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?