Phase III randomized clinical trial of intratumoral injection of E1B gene-deleted adenovirus (H101) combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in treating squamous cell cancer …

Zhong-Jun Xia, Jian-Hua Chang, Li Zhang, Wen-Qi Jiang, Zhong-Zhen Guan, Ji-Wei Liu, Yang Zhang, Xiao-Hua Hu, Guo-Hua Wu, Hua-Qing Wang, Zheng-Chang Chen, Jian-Chao Chen, Qing-Hua Zhou, Jian-Wei Lu, Qing-Xia Fan, Jian-Jin Huang, Xiao Zheng
2004-12-01
Abstract:MethodsA total of 160 patients were recruited. PF regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m (2) ivgtt, qd x 5d; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m (2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients have no history of PF chemotherapy, or sensitive to PF chemotherapy, while AF regimen (adriamycin 50 mg/m (2) iv, d1; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m (2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients didn't response to PF regimen. All patients were randomized to either receive intratumoral H101 injection (5.0 x 10 (11)-1.5 x 10 (12) VP/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks) or not. Treatment repeated every 3 weeks, all patients have to receive at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy.ResultsAmong 123 accordant patients, overall response rate of PF plus H101 group (group A1) was 78.8%(41/52), of PF alone group (group B1) was 39.6%(21/53), of AF plus H101 group (group A2) was 50.0%(7/14), of AF alone group (group B2) was 50.0%(2/4). Differences of response rates between group A1 and group B1, between group A1+ A2 and group B1+ B2 were significant (P= 0.000). Main side effects were fever (45.7%), injection site reaction (28.3%), and influenza-like symptoms (9.8%).ConclusionIntratumoral H101 injection showed a distinct efficacy in patients with squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus, and was relatively safe.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?