Abstract:Animals play a key role in biomedical research and other areas of scientific inquiry. But public opinion plays a key role in influencing how this area of science is regulated and funded. Nevertheless, scientists have historically been reticent to speak openly about their animal research or to open their animal facilities to the public in any way. Consequently, most of the available information has come from those opposed to animal research. This imbalance has led to suspicion and lagging public support for this work. To reverse this effect, efforts are now being made in many parts of the world to increase openness and transparency in this sector. The authors firmly believe that encouraging more institutions to join this movement, focused on better and greater communication, is essential to preserve the research community's "permission" to perform justifiable studies involving animals. For the purposes of this article, we consider "the public" to include that cross-section of society who may be asked their views in opinion poll studies and who may vote in elections. It also includes other influential groups such as the media, scientists working in other disciplines, animal welfare groups, and politicians who may shape regulatory frameworks. Public opinion on this issue matters. The majority of funding for biomedical research comes, either directly or indirectly, from the public purse. In the case of pharmaceutical research, funding derives from selling medicines to consumers. We therefore all have a vested interest in this funding. Furthermore, legislation that covers the use of animals in research is permissive-it allows scientists to do things that might otherwise contravene animal welfare laws. But this permission is normally contingent on complying with strict protective measures designed to ensure the work stays within the ethical framework that public opinion has deemed appropriate. Open and transparent communication is the best way to promote public understanding. There is thus a responsibility on all those involved in animal research, whether scientists, animal care staff, physicians, veterinarians, members of ethics committees, or managers and leaders, to support and promote public awareness and trust in this work. Circumstantial evidence shows that, with such open dialogue, there is decreased targeting and harassment of individuals and job pride and satisfaction for all involved is improved.

Mitigating animal methods bias to reduce animal use and improve biomedical translation

Animals, quality and the pursuit of relevance

Progress and promise of alternative animal and non-animal methods in biomedical research

Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review

Leveraging biomarkers and translational medicine for preclinical safety - Lessons for advancing the validation of alternatives to animal testing

An analysis of trends in the use of animal and non-animal methods in biomedical research and toxicology publications

Impact of quality and transparency in scientific writing on the reduction of animal usage in experimental protocols: a review based in pertinent literature

Protecting Human and Animal Health: The Road from Animal Models to New Approach Methods

Considering aspects of the 3Rs principles within experimental animal biology

Digitalization of toxicology: improving preclinical to clinical translation

Communicating About Animal Research with the Public

Ethics and Controversies in Animal Subjects Research and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making

Improving reproducibility in animal research

A Brief History of Use of Animals in Biomedical Research and Perspective on Non-Animal Alternatives

A Review on Alternative Methods to Experimental Animals in Biological Testing: Recent Advancement and Current Strategies

Advanced Methods and Implementations for the Meta-Analyses of Animal Models: Current Practices and Future Recommendations

Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation

Analysis of animal-to-human translation shows that only 5% of animal-tested therapeutic interventions obtain regulatory approval for human applications

Introduction to Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies

Minimizing observer bias in animal behavior studies revisited: Improvement, but a long way to go

Ex vivo and in vitro methods as a platform for studying anthropogenic effects on marine mammals: four challenges and how to meet them