Goal pursuit increases more after dietary success than after dietary failure: examining conflicting theories of self-regulation using ecological momentary assessment

Hannah van Alebeek,Christopher M. Jones,Julia Reichenberger,Björn Pannicke,Benjamin Schüz,Jens Blechert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01566-x

2024-02-29

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract:Maintaining a healthy body weight and reaching long-term dietary goals requires ongoing self-monitoring and behavioral adjustments. How individuals respond to successes and failures is described in models of self-regulation: while cybernetic models propose that failures lead to increased self-regulatory efforts and successes permit a reduction of such efforts, motivational models (e.g., social-cognitive theory) make opposite predictions. Here, we tested these conflicting models in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) context and explored whether effort adjustments are related to inter-individual differences in perceived self-regulatory success in dieting (i.e., weight management).

nutrition & dietetics,physiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the changes in individuals' self - regulation efforts after dietary success and failure, and to examine whether these changes are related to the differences in individuals' sense of self - regulation success. Specifically, the researchers wanted to verify two contradictory self - regulation theories:

1. **Calibrating Hypothesis**: According to the cybernetic model, dietary failure (i.e., not meeting the behavioral standard/goal) will lead to an increase in subsequent self - regulation efforts, while dietary success (i.e., meeting or exceeding the behavioral standard/goal) will lead to a decrease in subsequent self - regulation efforts.
2. **Self - Reinforcing Hypothesis**: According to motivation theories (such as social cognitive theory), dietary failure will lead to a decrease in subsequent self - regulation efforts, while dietary success will increase subsequent self - regulation efforts.

To test these two hypotheses, the researchers used the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) method and analyzed the data of 174 individuals interested in diet within 14 days through a linear mixed - effects model. The study focused on whether the dietary success or failure on the current day (e.g., Monday) would affect the adjustment of self - regulation efforts on the next day (e.g., Tuesday). Dietary success and failure were operationally defined through two EMA items: one was whether the food intake was higher or lower than usual; the other was whether the food intake was considered to be more in line with or not in line with the goal than usual.

The research results support the mechanism proposed by social cognitive theory, especially among individuals with a lower sense of self - regulation success. The increase in self - regulation efforts after dietary success is more significant in these individuals. This finding suggests that future dietary interventions can focus on preventing the decline in self - regulation efforts after dietary failure, thereby reducing the risk of a single dietary failure leading to unhealthy eating.