Morphology properties of scapular spine relative to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A biomechanical study

Junfeng Chen,Chen Chen,Chen Chen,Majid Nour,Debao Liu,Youyu Zhu,Wei Zhang,Kemal Polat,Xuefei Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104827
IF: 5.1
2023-08-01
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Abstract:ObjectiveStress fractures of the scapular spine are often a consequence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reconstruction. Knowledge of the morphology and strength of the scapular spine may have potential value in preoperative planning of RSA. However, the morphometric and biomechanics of the scapular spine have not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different morphology of the scapular spine and biomechanics to identify scapular spine with weaker strength that may be destroyed after RSA.MethodsAnatomical morphology of 102 dry scapulae was studied. Nine bony landmarks associated with the anatomical morphology of the scapular spine were measured. After the measurements, each specimen was loaded to failure under an axial compressive load. All the samples were analyzed at the point of failure to calculate the failure load and energy.ResultsFive types of scapular spine were observed in the population. Type I (fusiform shape) was the most frequent (32.4%), and the least common type included type V (S-shape) (4.9%). The morphological parameters for type II (slender rod shape) were smaller than those for the other types. Type II scapular spine withstood the lowest failure load (381.87 ± 25.31 N) and energy (1.45 ± 0.56 J), followed by type V (530.98 ± 25.26 N and 1.75 ± 0.49 J).ConclusionSignificant variation was observed in the anatomical morphology of scapular spine. Slender rod-shaped and S-shaped scapular spine bore lower load and energy, which may be the potential anatomical-related factors of stress fractures after RSA.
engineering, biomedical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?