Abstract:Objective: Evaluation of noninvasive left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MW) enables insights into cardiac contractility and efficacy beyond conventional echocardiography. However, there is limited intraoperative data on patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility and the intraoperative course of this technique of ventricular function assessment in these patients and compare it to conventional two (2D)- and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic measurements and strain analysis. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Single university hospital. Participants: Twenty-five patients scheduled for isolated AVR with preoperative preserved left and right ventricular function, sinus rhythm, without significant other heart valve disease or pulmonary hypertension, and an uneventful intraoperative course. Interventions: Transesophageal echocardiography was performed after induction of anesthesia (T1), after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2), and after sternal closure (T3). Evaluation was performed in stable hemodynamics, in sinus rhythm or atrial pacing and vasopressor support with norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 µg/kg/min. Measurements and main results: EchoPAC v206 software (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Norway) was used for analysis of 2D and 3D LV ejection fraction (EF), LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), LV global work index (GWI), LV global constructive work (GCW), LV global wasted work (GWW), and LV global work efficiency (GWE). Estimation of myocardial work was feasible in all patients. Although there was no significant difference in the values of 2D and 3D EF, GWI and GCW decreased significantly after AVR (T1 v T2, 1,647 ± 380 mmHg% v 1,021 ± 233 mmHg%, p < 0.001; T1 v T2, 2,095 ± 433 mmHg% v 1,402 ± 242 mmHg%, p < 0.001, respectively), while GWW remained unchanged (T1 v T2, 296 mmHg% [IQR 178-452) v 309 mmHg% [IQR 255-438), p = 0.97). This resulted in a decreased GWE directly after bypass (T1 v T2, 84% ± 6% v 78% ± 5%, p < 0.001), but GWE already improved at the end of surgery (T2 v T3, 78% ± 5% v 81% ± 5%, p = 0.003). There was no significant change in the values of GWI, GCW, or 2D and 3D LVEF before and after sternal closure (T2 v T3). Conclusion: LV MW analysis showed a reduction of LV workload after bypass in our group of patients, which was not detected by conventional echocardiographic measures. This evolving technique provides deeper insights into cardiac energetics and efficiency in the perioperative course of aortic valve replacement surgery.

Perioperative Assessment of the Hemodynamic Ventriculo-Arterial Junction of the Aortic Root by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Clinical values of intraoperative real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for surgery in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Utility of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Intraoperative Assessment of Mltral Valve Repair

Evaluation of a Novel Echocardiographic Three-Dimensional Automated Software for the Assessment of the Aortic Root in Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

[Value of Preoperative Assessment on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Procedure with High-Pitch Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography].

Comprehensive imaging evaluation of the aortic valve and root before aortic root surgery: a study comparing MDCT and TEE

Virtual Reality Computed Tomography Evaluation - Anatomy and Clinical Implications for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Role of Three-dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Controlled Study and Comparison with Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

Intraoperative Assessment of Noninvasive Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement

Morphological and dynamic analysis of the normal aortic valve with 4D computed tomography

Development of a Simple Analytical Model to Facilitate Preoperative Surgical Planning in Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Aortic Valve Embryology, Mechanobiology, and Second Messenger Pathways: Implications for Clinical Practice

Clinical introduction of a novel prosthesis for valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction for annuloaortic ectasia

Cardioroot Vs Valsalva: A Comparative Study In Patients Undergoing David With 4D Flow Method

Blood flow assessment technology in aortic surgery: a narrative review

Influence of Surgical Methods on Hemodynamics in Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis: A Computational Hemodynamic Analysis

The application value of real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in aortic valve implantation

Aortic root anatomy: insights into annular and root enlargement techniques

The value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic valve plasty

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?

Quantitative aortography for assessment of aortic regurgitation in the era of percutaneous aortic valve replacement