Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pediatric Infectious Diseases.
Yunqian Zhu,Mingyu Gan,Mengmeng Ge,Xinran Dong,Gangfeng Yan,Qinhua Zhou,Hui Yu,Xiaochuan Wang,Yun Cao,Guoping Lu,Bingbing Wu,Wenhao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00115-23
2023-01-01
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Abstract:Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown promise in the diagnosis of infectious diseases in adults, while its efficacy in pediatric infections remains uncertain. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,493 mNGS samples from pediatric patients with blood, central nervous system, and lower respiratory tract infections. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown promise in the diagnosis of infectious diseases in adults, while its efficacy in pediatric infections remains uncertain. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,493 mNGS samples from pediatric patients with blood, central nervous system, and lower respiratory tract infections. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and the negative percent agreement (NPA) of mNGS were compared to conventional microbiological tests (CMT) based on clinical diagnosis. The agreement of mNGS compared to CMT, as well as the clinical impact of mNGS, were valuated. Using the clinical diagnosis as a reference, mNGS demonstrated a significantly higher overall PPA compared to CMT (53.1% [95% CI = 49.7 to 56.6%] versus 25.8% [95% CI = 22.8 to 28.9%]), while maintaining a comparable overall NPA (93.2% [95% CI = 91.3 to 95.1%] versus 97.2% [95% CI = 95.9 to 98.4%]). In septic patients under 6 years of age or with immunosuppressive status, mNGS showed a higher PPA and a comparable NPA compared to CMT. The overall PPA and NPA of mNGS compared to CMT were 75.3 and 75.0%, respectively. The majority of cases of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and Pneumocystis jirovecii infections were identified by mNGS. A positive clinical impact of 14.0% (206/1,473), a negative impact of 0.8% (11/1,473), a nonimpact of 84.7% (1,248/1,473), and an unknown impact of 0.5% (8/1,473) were observed in the mNGS results. Notably, the positive impact was greater among immunosuppressed patients than among nonimmunosuppressed individuals (67/247, 27.1% versus 139/1,226, 11.3%; P < 0.001). mNGS is valuable for pathogen detection, diagnosis, and clinical management of infections among pediatric patients. mNGS was thus effective for the diagnosis of pediatric infections, which may guide clinical management. Patients with immunosuppressive conditions benefited more from mNGS testing.