Abstract:Background: The STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of risk-based stratified primary care versus usual care for patients with back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain. Trial quantitative results showed risk-based stratified care was not superior to usual care for patients' clinical outcomes, but the intervention led to some changes in GP clinical decision-making. This paper reports a linked qualitative study exploring how risk-based stratified care was perceived and used in the trial, from the perspectives of clinicians and patients. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients, and focus groups and interviews with 20 clinicians (GPs and physiotherapists) in the intervention arm of the trial. Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and the COM-B model. Main findings: Risk-based stratified care (subgrouping and matching treatments) was found to have 'coherence' (i.e. made sense) to several clinicians and patients, in that it was well-integrated in practice, and supported clinical decision-making. However, for some GPs stratified care was less 'meaningful', as the risk-stratification tool did not fit with usual ways of consulting and added to already time-pressured consultations. GPs reported giving more patients written information/advice due to easier access to electronic information leaflets through the trial template and were motivated to refer patients to physiotherapy as they believed the trial resulted in faster physiotherapy access (although this was not the case). Patients and clinicians reported that risk-based stratified care influenced conversations in the consultation, prompting greater attention to psychosocial factors, and facilitating negotiation of treatment options. Physiotherapists saw benefits in receiving information about patients' risk subgroup on referral forms. Conclusion: These findings provide context for interpreting some of the trial outcomes, particularly in relation to changes in clinical decision-making when risk-based stratified care was used. Findings also indicate potential reasons for lack of GP engagement with risk-based stratified care. Positive outcomes were identified that were not captured in the quantitative data, specifically that risk-based stratified care positively influenced some GP-patient conversations and facilitated negotiation of treatment options. Trial registration: ISRCTN15366334 (26/04/2016).

Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

First-contact physiotherapists' perceived competency in a new model of care for low back pain patients: a mixed methods study

Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review

Primary care barriers and facilitators to nonpharmacologic treatments for low back pain: A qualitative pilot study

First Contact Physiotherapy: A 4-Year Service Evaluation of UK Primary Care Data

Patients’ conceptions of undergoing physiotherapy for persistent low back pain delivered in Finnish primary healthcare by physiotherapists who had participated in brief training in cognitive functional therapy

Effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education programme on the physical activity of patients with chronic low back pain compared with a standard back school programme: protocol for a randomised controlled study (END-LC)

A Stratified Approach for Managing Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care : A Before-and-After Study

Physical activity advice given by French general practitioners for low back pain and the role of digital e-health applications: a qualitative study

'Look up from the waiting list and see the bigger picture': A qualitative analysis of clinical specialist physiotherapist perspectives on low back pain care in Ireland

Physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing evidence-based practice for patients with low back pain through the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention: a qualitative study

Physiotherapists' experiences of implementation of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a focus group interview study

Assessing the knowledge of low back pain among physiotherapists in Spain: A cohort study with pre- and post-educational course evaluation

"Every patient teaches you something new": experiences of physiotherapists delivering cognitive functional therapy for chronic, disabling low back pain in a randomised controlled trial

Required competencies for French physiotherapists for direct access to primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: consensus statement based on a Delphi survey

Cognitive Functional Therapy compared with usual physiotherapy care in people with persistent low back pain: A mixed methods feasibility randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom National Health Service

Protocol for lower back pain management: Insights from the French healthcare system

General Practitioners activity patterns: the medium-term impacts of Primary Care Teams in France

Design considerations in a clinical trial of a cognitive behavioural intervention for the management of low back pain in primary care: Back Skills Training Trial

Delivering an Optimised Behavioural Intervention (OBI) to people with low back pain with high psychological risk; results and lessons learnt from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of Contextual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CCBT) vs. Physiotherapy

Risk-based stratified primary care for common musculoskeletal pain presentations: qualitative findings from the STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial