Abstract:The theories of cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957) and selfperception (Bern, 1965) are reviewed in terms of the "insufficient justification" and "observer replication" laboratory paradigms. The controversy generated by their competing explanatory claims was evaluated in three separate contexts: as debate, theory, and metatheory. In a debating context it was concluded that Ben got the better of the controversy by observing the input requirements of his theory and marshalling against his critics evidence generated by their own failure to do likewise. Analytical and epistemological errors committed by the dissonance theory advocates were major factors in this csnclusion. With respect to the more substantive context of theory-testing, it was concluded that Bern failed to establish the plausibility of the cognitive process postulated by the self-perception theory. A unique counterinstance was cited to demonstrate that self-perception is not a wholly viable alternative analysis of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In addition, an examination of Bern's adherence to a functional analysis in conjunction with a simulation methodology raised doubts that such a strategy could deliver the desired information concerning plausibility of the self-perception process. When viewed at the level of metatheory, however, Bern was considered to have had a substantial influence upon the working commitments of a small community of his colleagues. This conclusion was derived from a metaphorical application of Kuhn's (1962) thesis concerning scientific revolutions to events in the recent history of Social Psychology. In this view, the self-perception theory is an historical marker which brings clearly into focus the transition of attitudinal research from a motivational-consistency "paradigm" to an information processing/attributional "paradigm". Three experiments are reported which make use of Bern's credibility cueing procedure to articulate the newer "paradigm". The first experiment provides support for a fundamental hypothesis derived from the selfperception theory. Subjects' recall of a task was systematically influenced by external discriminative stimuli for self-credibility when internal memory cues were relatively weak, but net when such cues were relatively strong. The use of a statistic which takes into account subjects' differential guessing strategies increased confidence in the self-perception interpretation of these results. The second experiment attempted to extend the credibility cueing effect beyond the traditional impersonal cueing situation to one involving interpersonal discriminative stimuli for self-credibility. Although procedural insights rendered the results inconclusive, a serendipitous observation was made. The results suggested a novel hypothesis that different stimulus persons could have differential effects on subjects' self-credibility. A third experiment provided support for this hypothesis. When one live interviewer was manipulated as a discriminative stimulus for selfcredibility, subjects' recall of a task was systematically influenced in accord with self-perception predictions. These effects did net occur

The distinctive characteristics of bullshit: intention, meaningfulness, and source reliability

The Complex Relation Between Receptivity to Pseudo-Profound Bullshit and Political Ideology

An In-Depth Bibliometric Exploration of Research on "Bullshit" Communication

Epistemically exploitative bullshit: A Sartrean account

Misperceptions in a post-truth world: Effects of subjectivism and cultural relativism on bullshit receptivity and conspiracist ideation

Measuring Bullshit in the Language Games played by ChatGPT

Do People Answer Honestly When Asked About a No Honest Behavior?

Freud, bullshit, and pseudoscience

Which cues are credible? – The relative importance and interaction of expertise, likes, shares, pictures and involvement while assessing the credibility of politicians’ Facebook postings

Authentic isn't always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration

Self-perception theory and credibility cueing : conceptual and empirical analyses

Relevance theory and the social realities of communication

‘Well, that’s just great!’: an empirically based analysis of non-literal and attitudinal content of ironic utterances

Deepfakes Unmasked: The Effects of Information Priming and Bullshit Receptivity on Deepfake Recognition and Sharing Intention

On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences

Bullying by definition: an examination of definitional components of bullying

Taking stock of an idiom's background assumptions: an alternative relevance theoretic account

Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy

Arrogant or self-confident? The use of contextual knowledge to differentiate hubristic and authentic pride from a single nonverbal expression

Similarity judgements: the comparison of normative predictions and subjective evaluations – A study of the ratio model of similarity in social context

The incongruity of workplace bullying victimization and inclusive excellence