A comparison of changes in drug burden index between older inpatients who fell and people who have not fallen: A case–control study

Claire E. T. O'Leary,Timothy J. Wilkinson,H. Carl Hanger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13333
2024-05-23
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Abstract:Objective Older inpatients who fall are often frail, with multiple co‐morbidities and polypharmacy. Although the causes of falls are multifactorial, sedating and delirium‐inducing drugs increase that risk. The aims were to determine whether people who fell had a change in their sedative and anticholinergic medication burden during an admission compared to people who did not fall. A secondary aim was to determine the factors associated with change in drug burden. Methods A retrospective, observational, case–control study of inpatients who fell. Two hundred consecutive people who fell were compared with 200 randomly selected people who had not fallen. Demographics, functional ability, frailty and cognition were recorded. For each patient, their total medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden were calculated on admission and on discharge, using the drug burden index (DBI). Results People who fell were more dependent and cognitively impaired than people who did not fallen. People who fell had a higher DBI on admission, than people who had not fall (mean: .69 vs .43, respectively, p
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?