Abstract:Innovative eHealth technologies are becoming increasingly common worldwide, with researchers and policy makers advocating their scale-up within and across health care systems. However, examples of successful scale-up remain extremely rare. Although this issue is widely acknowledged, there is still only a limited understanding of why scaling up eHealth technologies is so challenging. This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of the complexities innovators encounter when attempting to scale up eHealth technologies and their strategies for addressing these complexities. We draw on different theoretical perspectives as well as the findings of an interview-based case study of a prominent remote patient monitoring (RPM) innovation in the Netherlands. Specifically, we create a cross-disciplinary theoretical framework bringing together 3 perspectives on scale-up: a structural perspective (focusing on structural barriers and facilitators), an ecological perspective (focusing on local complexities), and a critical perspective (focusing on mutual adaptation between innovation and setting). We then mobilize these perspectives to analyze how various stakeholders (n=14) experienced efforts to scale up RPM technology. We provide 2 key insights: (1) the complexities and strategies associated with local eHealth scale-up are disconnected from those that actors encounter at a broader level scale-up, and this translates into a simultaneous need for stability and malleability, which catches stakeholders in an impasse, and (2) pre-existing circumstances and associated path dependencies shape the complexities of the local context and facilitate or constrain opportunities for the scale-up of eHealth innovation. The 3 theoretical perspectives used in this article, with their diverging assumptions about innovation scale-up, should be viewed as complementary and highlight different aspects of the complexities perceived as playing an important role. Using these perspectives, we conclude that the level at which scale-up is envisaged and the pre-existing local circumstances (2 factors whose importance is often neglected) contribute to an impasse in the scale-up of eHealth innovation at the broader level of scale.

Organizational scaling, scalability, and scale-up: Definitional harmonization and a research agenda

What is scaling?

From the Cabinet of Curiosities: The misdirection of research and policy debates on small firm growth

A systems approach to scale-up for population health improvement

The organizational culture of scale-ups and performance

SCALING CHALLENGES OF HIGH-TECH SMES DEVELOPING INTERNET OF THINGS TECHNOLOGY

Scaling early child development: what are the barriers and enablers?

Four Ways to Scale Up: Smart, Dumb, Forced, and Fumbled

A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Complexities of Scaling Up eHealth Innovation

Factors influencing the scale-up of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic literature review

Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World

Scalability in Visualization

From Caring Entrepreneur to Caring Enterprise: Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Scaling up Social Enterprises

What is Large in Large-Scale? A Taxonomy of Scale for Agile Software Development

The Scalability, Efficiency and Complexity of Universities and Colleges: A New Lens for Assessing the Higher Educational System

Business model scaling and growth hacking in digital entrepreneurship

Brand orientation: Conceptual extension, scale development and validation

Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition

Scaling Up Sustainability From an Operational Capability to a Dynamic Capability: The Case of Royal Bank of Scotland

Against Scale: Provocations and Resistances to Scale Thinking

Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World