Is Your Goal-Oriented Dialog Model Performing Really Well? Empirical Analysis of System-wise Evaluation

Ryuichi Takanobu,Qi Zhu,Jinchao Li,Baolin Peng,Jianfeng Gao,Minlie Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.07362

2020-05-15

Computation and Language

Abstract:There is a growing interest in developing goal-oriented dialog systems which serve users in accomplishing complex tasks through multi-turn conversations. Although many methods are devised to evaluate and improve the performance of individual dialog components, there is a lack of comprehensive empirical study on how different components contribute to the overall performance of a dialog system. In this paper, we perform a system-wise evaluation and present an empirical analysis on different types of dialog systems which are composed of different modules in different settings. Our results show that (1) a pipeline dialog system trained using fine-grained supervision signals at different component levels often obtains better performance than the systems that use joint or end-to-end models trained on coarse-grained labels, (2) component-wise, single-turn evaluation results are not always consistent with the overall performance of a dialog system, and (3) despite the discrepancy between simulators and human users, simulated evaluation is still a valid alternative to the costly human evaluation especially in the early stage of development.