Health and Climate Change – Authors' Reply
Nick Watts,Peng Gong,Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum,Anthony Costello,Elizabeth Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31134-1
2019-01-01
Abstract:We thank Timothy Florin and David Allen for their response to our 2018 Review.1Watts N Amann M Arnell N et al.The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come.Lancet. 2018; 392: 2479-2514Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (439) Google Scholar Our research collaboration exists to track progress in quantifying the links between public health and climate change, and has always sought to encourage scientific discussion on the topic. We also acknowledge the unpublished 34-page critique from Allen in response to our 2015 Lancet Commission, in which he, among other points, extolled the benefits of clean coal, and equated the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to that of “the domain of prophets, clairvoyants, and science fiction”. The Lancet Countdown collaboration comprises some 27 academic institutions and UN agencies from around the world (including WHO, the University of Reading and University College London in the UK, and Tsinghua University in Beijing, China), with expertise in areas ranging from climate science through to public health. Our work is peer-reviewed, and we are committed to the journal's excellent standards of objectivity and scientific rigour. In their Correspondence, Florin and Allen note the role of an urban heat island effect in worsening exposure to extreme heat. Here, we agree. The parallel trends of urbanisation, climate change, and population ageing are a triple threat, increasing the vulnerability to and impact of the health effects of heat and heatwaves.2Rydin Y Bleahu A Davies M et al.Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century.Lancet. 2012; 379: 2079-2108Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (485) Google Scholar We also agree on the importance of protecting vulnerable populations from fuel poverty and cold. However, what the Daily Mail article3Poulter S Campaigners demand urgent cuts to power bill after number of winter deaths among the elderly rise by 40%.The Daily Mail. Nov 23, 2017; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5109511/Calls-cut-power-bills-winter-deaths-rise-40.html#ixzz4zHs6iwleDate accessed: June 12, 2018Google Scholar they cite forgets to mention is that many of the best long-term solutions to reduce these issues involve climate change mitigation strategies focused on energy efficiency, and the provision of cheap renewable energy in countries such as the UK.4Committee on Climate ChangeEnergy prices and bills report 2017.https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/energy-prices-and-bills-report-2017/Date: March 16, 2017Date accessed: March 27, 2019Google Scholar These common sense, win–win strategies, with benefits to both public health and climate change mitigation, are at the core of much of our work. Equally, any CO2 fertilisation effect will eventually be outweighed by the negative effects of heat stress, drought, and flooding on agricultural productivity, resulting from unabated climate change. Evidence shows that wheat yields in Australia have already stalled because of the changing climate.5Hochman Z Gobbett DL Horan H Climate trends account for stalled wheat yields in Australia since 1990.Glob Chang Biol. 2017; 23: 2071-2081Crossref PubMed Scopus (149) Google Scholar Furthermore, CO2 greater than 450 parts per million is likely to have a negative effect on grain quality.6Erda L Wei X Hui J et al.Climate change impacts on crop yield and quality with CO2 fertilization in China.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005; 360: 2149-2154Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar A more complete analysis of the effects of climate change on health is provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—overall, they are expected to be overwhelmingly negative.7Smith KR Woodward A Campbell-Lendrum D et al.Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits.in: Field CB Barros VR Dokken DJ Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge2014: 709-754Google Scholar We note the authors' founding membership of Clexit (Climate Exit), an organisation formed with the founding statement that “The world must abandon this suicidal Global Warming crusade. Man does not and cannot control the climate. Climate and weather are always changing, but apart from cyclic spikes of El Nino warming, there has been no measurable warming for twenty years.”8Viv ForbesAfter Brexit, Clexit.http://clexit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clexit.pdfDate: July 31, 2016Date accessed: March 28, 2019Google Scholar Here, we disagree. The Lancet Countdown's research is part of a broader cost–benefit analysis grounded in fact, and comes to a similar conclusion to the many assessments done by the IPCC, the World Meteorological Organization, WHO, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Bank of England, and many more: that the cost of inaction is too great, and the potential benefits of action (including cleaner air, healthier diets, and more liveable cities) are too large to ignore.9Markandya A Sampedro J Smith SJ et al.Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2: e126-e133Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (291) Google Scholar We declare no competing interests. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to comeThe Lancet Countdown: tracking progress on health and climate change was established to provide an independent, global monitoring system dedicated to tracking the health dimensions of the impacts of, and the response to, climate change. The Lancet Countdown tracks 41 indicators across five domains: climate change impacts, exposures, and vulnerability; adaptation, planning, and resilience for health; mitigation actions and health co-benefits; finance and economics; and public and political engagement. Full-Text PDF Health and climate changeWe commend The Lancet for addressing climate change and health but think the 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change by Nick Watts and colleagues1 compromises the journal's standard of objectivity. The Article is based on ten recommendations of the 2015 Lancet Commission on Health and Climate Change,2 for which one of us provided a critique to the lead author in 2015. Full-Text PDF