Abstract:This work reports directional single cell migration guided by a strain gradient, termed tensotaxis. A programmable uniaxial cell stretch device is developed to establish a continuous strain gradient field without generating a stiffness gradient. Focal adhesion analysis and motor‐clutch model demonstrate that tensotaxis is driven by strain‐introduced traction force and integrin fibronectin pairs' catch‐release dynamics. Strain gradients widely exist in development and physiological activities. The directional movement of cells is essential for proper cell localization, and directional cell migration in responses to gradients of chemicals, rigidity, density, and topography of extracellular matrices have been well‐established. However; it is unclear whether strain gradients imposed on cells are sufficient to drive directional cell migration. In this work, a programmable uniaxial cell stretch device is developed that creates controllable strain gradients without changing substrate stiffness or ligand distributions. It is demonstrated that over 60% of the single rat embryonic fibroblasts migrate toward the lower strain side in static and the 0.1 Hz cyclic stretch conditions at ≈4% per mm strain gradients. It is confirmed that such responses are distinct from durotaxis or haptotaxis. Focal adhesion analysis confirms higher rates of contact area and protrusion formation on the lower strain side of the cell. A 2D extended motor‐clutch model is developed to demonstrate that the strain‐introduced traction force determines integrin fibronectin pairs' catch‐release dynamics, which drives such directional migration. Together, these results establish strain gradient as a novel cue to regulate directional cell migration and may provide new insights in development and tissue repairs.

Tractions and Stress Fibers Control Cell Shape and Rearrangements in Collective Cell Migration

Correlating Cell Shape and Cellular Stress in Motile Confluent Tissues

Controlling cell-matrix traction forces by extracellular geometry

Coordinated tractions increase the size of a collectively moving pack in a cell monolayer

How Do Cells Produce and Regulate the Driving Force in the Process of Migration?

A Simple Force-Motion Relation for Migrating Cells Revealed by Multipole Analysis of Traction Stress

Cellular Mechanics of Finger-Like Structures of Collective Cell Migration

Both contractile axial and lateral traction force dynamics drive amoeboid cell motility

The interplay of cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesion in collective cell migration

Cell-substrate distance fluctuations of confluent cells enable fast and coherent collective migration

Impact of Cell Shape on Cell Migration Behavior on Elastic Substrate.

Geometric Regulation of Collective Cell Tangential Ordering Migration

Distribution of Traction Forces and Intracellular Markers Associated with Shape Changes During Amoeboid Cell Migration

Quantitative Analyses of Collective Cell Motion on the Patterned Surfaces

Cell Density and Actomyosin Contractility Control the Organization of Migrating Collectives Within an Epithelium

Weakening of resistance force by cell–ECM interactions regulate cell migration directionality and pattern formation

Substrate stress relaxation regulates monolayer fluidity and leader cell formation for collectively migrating epithelia.

Dynamic Migration Modes of Collective Cells.

Optogenetic generation of leader cells reveals a force-velocity relation for collective cell migration

Mechanical stress as a regulator of cell motility

Directional Cell Migration Guided by a Strain Gradient