Impact of Sugarcane Cultivation on C Cycling in Southeastern United States Following Conversion From Grazed Pastures

Nuria Gomez‐Casanovas,Elena Blanc‐Betes,Carl J. Bernacchi,Elizabeth H. Boughton,Wendy Yang,Caitlin Moore,Taylor L. Pederson,Amartya Saha,Evan H. DeLucia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70003
2024-09-27
GCB Bioenergy
Abstract:The expansion of sugarcane for bioenergy production will reshape the Southeastern US landscape, particularly as it displaces predominant land uses. We investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in Florida impacts C fluxes and examined driving mechanisms. We observed rapid shifts in net C storage of cane after initial C losses typical of land disturbance, and that stand age and low water availability profoundly limited net C uptake. We conclude that the ultimate impact of land conversion on the regional C balance depends on the pasture type converted to sugarcane and that no‐burn management strategies are critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in Southeastern United States. The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high‐yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi‐native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO2 than pastures, indicating the importance of CO2 losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO2 after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO2 sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO2 uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO2 sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C‐balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no‐burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.
energy & fuels,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?