Group size versus territory size in group‐living badgers: a large‐sample field test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis

Dominic DP Johnson, David W Macdonald, Chris Newman, Michael D Morecroft
2001-11-01
Abstract:Badgers (Meles meles) have been the focus for the development of a pervasive model of social grouping behaviour, relevant to a number of carnivore species and other taxonomic groups – the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). The RDH hypothesises that the dispersion and richness of resources in the environment provide a passive mechanism for the formation of groups, even without any direct benefits of group living. However, few studies have tested the RDH in the field. The principal prediction is that, as opposed to enlargement of territory sizes to accommodate more members, territory size (TS) is independent of group size (GS). Instead, TS is determined by the spatial dispersion of resources, while GS is independently determined by the richness of those resources. However, these predictions provide only weak correlative tests, especially in non‐experimental field studies. The first predicts an absence …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?