Abstract:The authors show how habitat features shaped variation in local population size in great tits, and how population size subsequently affected social structure. However, much of the observed social structure was still shaped by social processes such as the birds' preference to forage in flocks and social relationships between them. The structure of animal societies is a key determinant of many ecological and evolutionary processes. Yet, we know relatively little about the factors and mechanisms that underpin detailed social structure. Among other factors, social structure can be influenced by habitat configuration. By shaping animal movement decisions, heterogeneity in habitat features, such as vegetation and the availability of resources, can influence the spatiotemporal distribution of individuals and subsequently key socioecological properties such as the local population size and density. Differences in local population size and density can impact opportunities for social associations and may thus drive substantial variation in local social structure. Here, we investigated spatiotemporal variation in population size at 65 distinct locations in a small songbird, the great tit (Parus major) and its effect on social network structure. We first explored the within‐location consistency of population size from weekly samples and whether the observed variation in local population size was predicted by the underlying habitat configuration. Next, we created social networks from the birds' foraging associations at each location for each week and examined if local population size affected social structure. We show that population size is highly repeatable within locations across weeks and years and that some of the observed variation in local population size was predicted by the underlying habitat, with locations closer to the forest edge having on average larger population sizes. Furthermore, we show that local population size affected social structure inferred by four global network metrics. Using simple simulations, we then reveal that much of the observed social structure is shaped by social processes. Across different population sizes, the birds' social structure was largely explained by their preference to forage in flocks. In addition, over and above effects of social foraging, social preferences between birds (i.e. social relationships) shaped certain network features such as the extent of realized social connections. Our findings thus suggest that individual social decisions substantially contribute to shaping certain social network features over and above effects of population size alone.

Changes in the flocking behaviour of wintering English titmice with time, weather and supplementary food

Influence of social and physical environmental variation on antipredator behavior in mixed-species parid flocks

Long‐term declines in winter body mass of tits throughout Britain and Ireland correlate with climate change

Flocking behaviour of passerines: a dynamic model for the non-reproductive season

Flock Size and Vigilance in Parrots

Social foraging and the associated benefits of group‐living in Cliff Swallows decrease over 40 years

Social network centrality predicts dietary decisions in a wild bird population

Optimal thermal niche-tracking buffers wild great tits against climate change

Northward expanding resident species benefit from warming winters through increased foraging rates and predator vigilance

Great tits (Parus major) in a west European temperate forest show little seasonal variation in metabolic energy requirements

Variation in local population size predicts social network structure in wild songbirds

Social network connections are positively related to temperature in winter flocks of black-capped chickadees

Variation in diel timing in great tits is affected by the timing of their social mate

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors modulating vigilance and foraging in two gregarious foragers

A real-time response of vigilance behaviour to changes in group size

Prehatching temperatures drive inter-annual cohort differences in great tit metabolism

How interacting anthropogenic pressures alter the plasticity of breeding time in two common songbirds

Winter-ground microhabitat use by differently coloured phenotypes affects return rate in a long-distance migratory bird

Dominance, Daily Activity and Winter Survival in Willow Tits: Detrimental Cost of Long Working Hours?

Seasonal nest use of sympatric North American flying squirrels

Can video playback provide social information for foraging blue tits?