Validation of machine learning algorithms for differentiating tuberculous from malignant pleural effusion.

Chelluri,S. I.,Prasad,A.,Johal,J. S.,Sharma,S.,Kakani,S.,Bargaje,M. D.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5042
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) have clinical and fluidic similarities. The sensitivity and specificity of investigations for diagnosing MPE and TPE are low, making it a challenge to initiate treatment. Machine Learning algorithms provide a practical solution in such scenarios requiring objective decisions based on patient data. We assessed the applicability of different ML algorithms in tackling this conundrum. Methods: This study analyzed data from 129 patients, including 72 with Tuberculous Pleural Effusion (TBE), 28 with Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE), and 29 with other causes. To be included in the TBE group, patients must have tested positive for M. tuberculosis through PCR, displayed Caseating Granulomas in pleural biopsies, AFB positive in pleural fluid smears, or responded positively to empirical Anti-Tubercular Therapy. MPE was diagnosed based on atypical and malignant cells in pleural fluid cytology and pleural biopsies respectively, or a confirmed primary malignancy diagnosis. Based on seventeen clinical and laboratory parameters of the highest significance, we trained and tested with a 70:30 ratio, four ML algorithms: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Logistic Regression (LR) and Multinomial Naïve Bayes (MNB). The accuracy, precision, recall and f1-score of the four models were calculated. Results: The accuracies of the RF, XGB, LR and MNB were 81%, 74%, 64% and 63% respectively. RF performed the best of the four, followed by XGB, LR and MNB. Conclusion: ML shows promise in expedited analysis of patient parameters and diagnosis of either TPE or MPE with good efficiency and accuracy.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?