Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118
2019-10-03
Abstract:Background We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. Methods In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. Results The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. Conclusions Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424 .) Supported by Bayer. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. Dr. Eikelboom reports receiving grant support and honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi-Aventis; Dr. Connolly, receiving lecture fees and consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo, and Medtronic; Dr. Hart, receiving grant support, fees for serving as principal investigator of the Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin in Secondary Prevention of Stroke and Prevention of Systemic Embolism in Patients with Recent Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial, and advisory-board fees from Bayer; Dr. Diaz, receiving grant support from the Population Health Research Institute; Dr. Alings, receiving consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; Dr. Lonn, receiving consulting fees from Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis, and Servier; Dr. Anand, receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Bayer and Novartis; Dr. Avezum, receiving consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; Dr. Branch, receiving grant support from Astellas and serving on an advisory board for Janssen; Dr. Bhatt, receiving grant support from Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis, the Medicines Company, Roche, Pfizer, Forest Laboratories/AstraZeneca, Ischemix, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Chiesi, and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, collaborating on research (uncompensated) with FlowCo, PLx Pharma, Takeda, and Merck, receiving fees for serving on data monitoring committees, an operations committee, a publications committee (USA co-national leader), and a steering committee from the Population Health Research Institute, serving as editor-in-chief of the Harvard Heart Letter for Belvoir Publications, serving as chief medical editor of Cardiology Today’s Intervention for Slack Publications, receiving fees for serving on continuing medical education steering committees from WebMD, receiving advisory-board fee -Abstract Truncated-