Improving the accuracy of O 3 prediction from a chemical transport model with a random forest model in the Yangtze River Delta region, China

Kaili Xiong,Xiaodong Xie,Jianjong Mao,Kang Wang,Lin Huang,Jingyi Li,Jianlin Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120926

IF: 8.9

2023-01-05

Environmental Pollution

Abstract:Due to inherent errors in the chemical transport models, inaccuracies in the input data, and simplified chemical mechanisms, ozone (O 3 ) predictions are often biased from observations. Accurate O 3 predictions can better help assess its impacts on public health and facilitate the development of effective prevention and control measures. In this study, we used a random forest (RF) model to construct a bias-correction model to correct the bias in the predictions of hourly O 3 (O 3 -1h), daily maximum 8-h O 3 (O 3 -Max8h), and daily maximum 1-h O 3 (O 3 -Max1h) concentrations from the Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model in the Yangtze River Delta region. The results show that the RF model successfully captures the nonlinear response relationship between O 3 and its influence factors, and has an outstanding performance in correcting the bias of O 3 predictions. The normalized mean biases (NMBs) of O 3 -1h, O 3 -Max8h, and O 3 -Max1h decrease from 15.8%, 20.0%, and 17.0.% to 0.5%, −0.8%, and 0.1%, respectively; correlation coefficients increase from 0.78, 0.90, and 0.89 to 0.94, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. For O 3 -1h and O 3 -Max8h, the original CMAQ model shows an obvious bias in the central and southern Zhejiang region, while the RF model decreases the NMB values from 54% to −1% and 34% to −4%, respectively. The O 3 -1h bias is mainly caused by the bias of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ). Relative humidity and temperature are also important factors that lead to the bias of O 3 . For high O 3 concentrations, the temperature bias and O 3 observations are the major reasons for the discrepancy between the model and the observations.

environmental sciences