Abstract:Purpose: Mediation analyses allow for exploration of causal mechanisms that explain how a predictor is related to an outcome. Tests of mediation are fundamental to addressing some of the most consequential questions in rehabilitation science. In recent decades, the development of easy-to-use analytical tools has made conducting statistical tests of mediation more accessible to researchers. Unfortunately, there are persistent problems in the conceptual underpinning of many tests of mediation. Even in cases where the statistical analyses are correctly run, problems with the underlying rationale for the mediational analysis will render the results inconsequential, in the best case, or misleading, in the worst case. Method: In this commentary, I summarize the uses of mediation analysis and through a series of six main types of errors provide practical, plain language guidance ("Dos and Don'ts") for conducting a conceptually robust mediation analysis. Results: The "Dos and Don'ts" laid out in this commentary highlight that there are persistent issues with lack of understanding of mediation, confusion about the differences between moderation, mediation, and covariates, lack of strong theoretical justification for mediation, and lack of attention to methodological issues (e.g., measurement) in many mediation analyses. Conclusions: Promoting the use of mediation analysis in rehabilitation research will advance theory and effective practice in our field. Researchers undertaking mediation analysis are encouraged to prioritize developing a strong theoretical framework that justifies use of mediation analysis, ensuring study methodology supports and enables tests of mediation, as well emphasizing a strong statistical approach to conducting the test of mediation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Statistical mediation analysis.

Statistical Approaches for Enhancing Causal Interpretation of the M to Y Relation in Mediation Analysis

Bayesian Mediation Analysis.

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

Guidelines for the Investigation of Mediating Variables in Business Research

Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis

Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers

Clinically Relevant Mediation Analysis using Controlled Indirect Effect

One step at a time: A statistical approach for distinguishing mediators, confounders, and colliders using direction dependence analysis.

Causal mediation analysis in presence of multiple mediators uncausally related

Bayesian Dynamic Mediation Analysis

Exploratory Mediation Analysis with Many Potential Mediators

A default Bayesian hypothesis test for mediation

A Unification of Mediator, Confounder, and Collider Effects

Total-effect Test May Erroneously Reject So-called "full" or "complete" Mediation

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Multilevel Intervention and Multicomponent Mediator Case

Dos and don'ts for conducting mediation analysis: A commentary with practical tips to avoid common problems.

When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect

Causal mediation analysis: From simple to more robust strategies for estimation of marginal natural (in)direct effects