Abstract:Background Carotid near-occlusion (CNO) is distal luminal collapse of the internal carotid artery beyond a tight stenosis. CNO is a relatively rare condition accounting for 3% in symptomatic carotid stenosis and about 20% in severe (≥70%) symptomatic stenosis. The optimal treatment for CNO remains controversial. Methods This systematic review and metaanalysis were performed in accordance with the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines (MOOSE). We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for articles published from inception date to November 2018. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of studies. We defined primary outcome as any stroke, death and myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days after intervention and the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) were evaluated by the incidence rate (IR) of the primary outcome. Secondary outcome was defined as ipsilateral stroke, neurogenic or cardiac death and MI during the follow-up. Long-term risk was evaluated by the IR of secondary outcome. The analyses used the IRs of secondary outcome and restenosis per person-year (p-y) were performed to evaluate long-term risk and restenosis. Pooled analyses of different therapy groups were calculated. Results Twenty-eight articles of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for pooled analysis. Pooled IR of secondary outcome was 4.26 per 100 p-ys (95% CI, 2.92–6.20 per 100 p-ys) in intervention group (heterogeneity, I2 = 56.1%, P < 0.01; Egger test, P = 0.73) and 13.3 per 100 p-ys (95% CI, 5.54–31.95 per 100 p-ys) in best medical treatment (BMT) group (heterogeneity, I2 = 88.3%, P < 0.01; Egger test, P = 0.76). No significant difference was demonstrated in operative risk (CEA: 4.82%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.07–7.55%; CAS: 5.39%, 95% CI: 3.69–7.88%) and long-term risk (CEA: 4.47 per 100 p-ys, 95% CI: 3.35–5.97 per 100 p-ys; CAS: 4.71 per 100 p-ys, 95% CI: 2.37–9.37 per 100 p-ys) between CEA and CAS group. Conclusions BMT alone may be not enough to support a better prognosis than CEA or CAS for patients with CNO. No significant difference was found between patients with CNO who underwent CAS and CEA in both perioperative period and long-term follow-up. Carotid near-occlusion (CNO) is distal luminal collapse of the internal carotid artery beyond a tight stenosis. CNO is a relatively rare condition accounting for 3% in symptomatic carotid stenosis and about 20% in severe (≥70%) symptomatic stenosis. The optimal treatment for CNO remains controversial. This systematic review and metaanalysis were performed in accordance with the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines (MOOSE). We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for articles published from inception date to November 2018. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of studies. We defined primary outcome as any stroke, death and myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days after intervention and the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) were evaluated by the incidence rate (IR) of the primary outcome. Secondary outcome was defined as ipsilateral stroke, neurogenic or cardiac death and MI during the follow-up. Long-term risk was evaluated by the IR of secondary outcome. The analyses used the IRs of secondary outcome and restenosis per person-year (p-y) were performed to evaluate long-term risk and restenosis. Pooled analyses of different therapy groups were calculated. Twenty-eight articles of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for pooled analysis. Pooled IR of secondary outcome was 4.26 per 100 p-ys (95% CI, 2.92–6.20 per 100 p-ys) in intervention group (heterogeneity, I2 = 56.1%, P < 0.01; Egger test, P = 0.73) and 13.3 per 100 p-ys (95% CI, 5.54–31.95 per 100 p-ys) in best medical treatment (BMT) group (heterogeneity, I2 = 88.3%, P < 0.01; Egger test, P = 0.76). No significant difference was demonstrated in operative risk (CEA: 4.82%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.07–7.55%; CAS: 5.39%, 95% CI: 3.69–7.88%) and long-term risk (CEA: 4.47 per 100 p-ys, 95% CI: 3.35–5.97 per 100 p-ys; CAS: 4.71 per 100 p-ys, 95% CI: 2.37–9.37 per 100 p-ys) between CEA and CAS group. BMT alone may be not enough to support a better prognosis than CEA or CAS for patients with CNO. No significant difference was found between patients with CNO who underwent CAS and CEA in both perioperative period and long-term follow-up.

Cartoid Near Occlusion: Time to Re-think Endarectomy?

[A Single Center Large Cohort Study on Perioperative Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy of 547 Cases].

Staged Endovascular Recanalization for Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Non-Acutely Occluded Internal Carotid Artery.

A Novel Endovascular Technique for Recanalization of Carotid Artery Chronic Total Occlusion: Staged Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Carotid Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Carotid Near-Occlusion With Recurrent Symptoms

Carotid Near-Occlusion: Surgical or Conservative Management? Retrospective Multicenter Study

Perioperative and follow-up results of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with carotid near-occlusion.

705 Urgent or Emergent Endovascular Intervention for Neurological Deficits Post-carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-institutional Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

Carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid near occlusions: Feasibility, safety and outcome analysis

A Systematic Review and Updated Metaanalysis for Carotid Near-Occlusion

Cranial nerve injuries post carotid endarterectomy: a 15-year prospective study with routine otolaryngologist and neurological evaluation

Outcomes of Preferential Early Carotid Endarterectomy following Recent Stroke

Propensity-Matched Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Carotid Endarterectomy

Role of mini access during carotid endarterectomy: a prospective observational study

Surgical therapy for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

General Versus Nongeneral Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Study on 25 000 Patients

A Single-Center Retrospective Study with 1-Year Follow-Up after CEA in Patients with Severe Carotid Stenosis with Contralateral Carotid Artery Occlusion

Comparison of two surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy: Conventional and eversion

A proposed modern standardized technical approach for symptomatic chronic carotid total occlusion management

Management of neurophysiological monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy exposure

Effectiveness of carotid council in the treatment of carotid artery disease: Early-term outcomes of the multidisciplinary approach