Clarifying Mendelian vs non-Mendelian inheritance

Susan Strome,Needhi Bhalla,Rohinton Kamakaka,Upasna Sharma,William Sullivan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae078
IF: 4.402
2024-05-30
Genetics
Abstract:Gregor Mendel developed the principles of segregation and independent assortment in the mid-1800s based on his detailed analysis of several traits in pea plants. Those principles, now called Mendel's laws, in fact, explain the behavior of genes and alleles during meiosis and are now understood to underlie "Mendelian inheritance" of a wide range of traits and diseases across organisms. When asked to give examples of inheritance that do NOT follow Mendel's laws, in other words, examples of non-Mendelian inheritance, students sometimes list incomplete dominance, codominance, multiple alleles, sex-linked traits, and multigene traits and cite as their sources the Khan Academy, Wikipedia, and other online sites. Against this background, the goals of this Perspective are to (1) explain to students, healthcare workers, and other stakeholders why the examples above, in fact, display Mendelian inheritance, as they obey Mendel's laws of segregation and independent assortment, even though they do not produce classic Mendelian phenotypic ratios and (2) urge individuals with an intimate knowledge of genetic principles to monitor the accuracy of learning resources and work with us and those resources to correct information that is misleading.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of distinguishing between Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance. The authors found that many students, healthcare workers, and other related personnel are confused when determining whether certain genetic phenomena follow Mendel's laws. Specifically, many online resources (such as Khan Academy and Wikipedia) incorrectly list incomplete dominance, codominance, multiple alleles, sex-linked traits, and polygenic traits as non-Mendelian inheritance. The main objectives of the paper are twofold: 1. To explain why the aforementioned examples actually demonstrate Mendelian inheritance, even though they do not produce classic Mendelian phenotypic ratios. This is because these examples still adhere to Mendel's laws of segregation and independent assortment. 2. To call on professionals with genetic knowledge to oversee the accuracy of learning resources and collaborate with relevant resources to correct misleading information. The paper emphasizes the importance of classifying inheritance patterns based on genotypic ratios rather than phenotypic ratios. Genotypic ratios reflect the segregation and independent assortment of alleles during meiosis in parents, which is the foundation of Mendel's laws; whereas phenotypic ratios reflect the relationships between alleles in the offspring and the manner in which their products act.