What Is the Evidence Supporting Osteobiologic Use in Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Sathish Muthu,Sara Elisa Diniz,Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan,Patrick C. Hsieh,Aidin Abedi,Tim Yoon,Hans Jörg Meisel,Zorica Buser,Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto,AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221133751
2024-02-01
Global Spine Journal
Abstract:Study design Systematic literature review Objective To analyze the literature and describe the evidence supporting osteobiologic use in revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Methods A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted for literature reporting the use of osteobiologics in revision ACDF. We searched for studies reporting outcomes of using any osteobiologic use in revision ACDF surgeries (independently of the number of levels) in the above databases. Results There are currently no studies in the literature describing the outcome and comparative efficacy of diverse osteobiologic agents in the context of revision ACDF surgery. A majority of the current evidence is based only upon studies involving primary ACDF surgery. Conclusion The current study highlights the paucity of literature evidence on the role of diverse osteobiologics in revision ACDF, and foregrounds the need for high-quality evidence on this subject.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?