Abstract:Introduction To evaluate the cost and efficiency of suture‐mediated percutaneous closure (SMC) compared to manual compression (MC) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. SMC has been demonstrated to be efficacious in reducing hemostasis and bedrest times after AF ablation. To date, randomized data comparing the direct and indirect cost between the two techniques have not been described. Methods We conducted a 1:1 randomized trial comparing SMC to MC following AF ablation. The primary endpoints have been previously published. However, secondary endpoints pertinent to indirect cost including complication rates, hospital utilization (i.e., delays in discharge, additional patient encounters, nursing utilization), pain, patient reported outcomes, as well as the direct costs of care associated with AF ablation were collected. We also performed secondary analysis of the primary endpoint to evaluate for a learning curve, and subgroups analysis comparing efficacy across different numbers of access sites and compared to those in the MC group with a figure‐of‐eight suture (Fo8), that could potentially have impacted the relative efficiency of the procedure. Results A total of 107 patients were randomized and included: 53 in the SMC group and 54 in MC. A learning curve was observed in the SMC group between the first and second half of the study group (p = 0.037), with no such difference in the MC group. After accounting for the number of access sites, time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC Group (p = 0.002). Compared to those in the Fo8 arm (n = 37), the time to hemostasis remained shorter in the SMC group (p = 0.001). Among those planned for same‐day discharge, there were more delays in the MC group (31.5% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.0144). Rates of major and minor complications were similar between SMC and MC groups at discharge (p = 0.243) and 30 days (p = 1.00), as were nursing utilization, self‐reported pain, and overall patient reported outcomes. The overall cost of care related to the procedure was similar between the MC and SMC groups ( 45 699.47, 57 050.44 [ 66 426.34], p = 0.601). Conclusion SMC has been shown to decrease time to hemostasis and ambulation and facilitate earlier same‐day discharge after AF ablation without an increase in direct or indirect costs.

Safety of multi-access site venous closure following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and flutter

Feasibility and safety of total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Totally Percutaneous Decannulation in Patients with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure with suture-mediated vascular closure device

Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study

Preclose Versus Postclose Using Suture-Mediated Vascular Closure System for Catheter Ablation With Femoral Vein Access

Costs, efficiency, and patient‐reported outcomes associated with suture‐mediated percutaneous closure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract 14277: Comparison of Three Vascular Closure Devices for Vascular Access Closure After Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures

Two different hybrid vascular access closure strategies post transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous post-closure technique during the decannulation for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Outcomes of vascular closure devices for femoral venous hemostasis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Efficacy and safety of the VASCADE® MVP venous vascular closure device in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion with WATCHMAN

Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large Bore Access Closure After Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Hepatic and splenic venous access tract closure using the VASCADE vascular closure system following percutaneous intervention in patients with CHD

ProGlide‐AngioSeal versus ProGlide‐FemoSeal for vascular access hemostasis posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Safety Evaluation of Vascular Closure Devices in Femoral Artery Access

International Incidence of Complications after Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (af): Insights from the Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Star Af Ii Trial

Safety and efficacy of Mynx vascular closure device for the closure of common femoral artery access after ipsilateral stent placement

Near zero vascular complications using echo‐guided puncture during catheter ablation of arrhythmias: A retrospective study and literature review

Systematic review of multiple versus single device closure of Secundum atrial septal defects in adults