P822 Therapeutic Management And Risk Of Colectomy In Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis And Previous Exposure To Anti-Tnf Drugs. A Cohort Study Of Geteccu

F Mesonero Gismero,A López-García,J Miranda-Bautista,C Rubín de Célix,I Marín-Jiménez,C Suárez,A Martin-Cardona,E Fuentes,A Mínguez,A Castaño,C Roig,A Fernández-Clotet,C J Gargallo-Puyuelo,B Álvarez Herrero,M J García,J X Segarra-Ortega,M C Rodríguez-Grau,F López Romero-Salazar,I Olmella,D Martín-Rodríguez,M González Vivo,Á Ponferrada,I Baston-Rey,J M Benítez,C Reygosa,E A Lastiri González,P G Delgado-Guillena,L Torrealba,A Hernández-Camba,L Bernal,G Pinero,E Brunet,M Irabien,M Marquès-Camí,Y Zabana,A Gutiérrez,On behalf of Young Group of GETECCU,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0952
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background There are few data regarding the management on acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) flare in patients with previous anti-TNF exposure. We evaluated the medical management, the risk of colectomy and factors associated comparing with a bionaive cohort. Methods A retrospective and multicentric study of GETECCU. Patients with ASUC episode between 2010-2020 were included in two cohorts: bio-exposed (cohort 1) and bio-naive (cohort 2). Patients with previous other biologics or JAK inhibitors exposure were excluded. Steroid response was defined as reduction of bowel movements and C Reactive Protein (CRP). Rescue therapy was used after steroid failure and maintenance therapy after steroid or rescue therapy response/remission. Clinical effectiveness of rescue and maintenance therapy was analyzed using partial mayo score (clinical response with decreased of 2-3 points, clinical remission ≤2). Colectomy rate was evaluated at short and long-term using survival analysis and was compared using cox logistic regression. Results Finally, 461 patients were included from 33 centres. Basal characteristics and medical management are shown in Table 1. Bioexposed patients received steroid therapy less frequently (82 vs 97%, p 0.001). Comparing with bionaive cohort, there were differences between medical management although steroid response and the use of rescue therapy were similar. However, clinical remission at one year was lower (44 vs 59%, p 0.03). Colectomy rates at 1 and 12 months were of 15 and 17% in Cohort 1, respectively. Comparing with bionaive cohort, there were a higher risk of colectomy at short and long-term, HR 2.46 (1.57-3.87, p 0.001) (Figure 1). There were no factors associated with colectomy at one year. Response to steroids was the only protective factor of colectomy at one year (RR 0.17, 0.07-0.45, p 0.001). Conclusion Management of ASUC in bio-exposed patients is heterogeneus and differs from bionaive patients. The risk of colectomy is increased. Although the response to medical treatment is not negligible, special efforts in standardizing therapies are warranted in order to improve prognosis.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?