A meta-analysis of therapeutic trials of topical ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of vitiligo: therapeutic efficacy, safety, and implications for therapeutic practice
Abbas F Abdul Hussein,Ahmed S Shams,Nora Hosny,Amr Elrosasy,Marwan Kobtan,Yasmin Ahmed Shafik,Zeinab Raed Alnatsheh,Mohamed Abo Zeid,Mugahed Qarma,Yathrib K Ibrahim,Hussein Abbas Al-Sultany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-03267-8
2024-08-12
Abstract:Vitiligo, an autoimmune condition characterized by depigmented skin patches due to the loss of functional melanocytes, has been linked to dysregulation in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, particularly in IFN-g signaling. The use of JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib cream, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, presents a promising approach for vitiligo treatment. This study aims to systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of ruxolitinib cream in patients with vitiligo. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of vitiligo. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data selection, screening, extraction, and risk of bias assessment were meticulously performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.4, with significant heterogeneity addressed through appropriate methods. Our meta-analysis included 3 studies with 830 vitiligo patients. Significant improvements were observed in F-VASI, T-VASI, F-BSA, and T-BSA scores, with greater efficacy at 24 weeks compared to 12 weeks [MD -24.17, 95% CI (-31.78 to -16.56), P < 0.00001], [MD -14.12, 95% CI (-20.54 to -7.70); P < 0.0000], [MD -16.25, 95% CI (-22.20 to -10.31), P < 0.00001], [MD -9.19, 95% CI (-13.47 to -4.92); P < 0.00001]. Ruxolitinib showed increased risk ratios for F-VASI75, F-VASI90, and F-VASI50, indicating better outcomes with longer treatment durations [MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.88-4.49; P < 0.00001], [MD 4.66, 95% CI 2.09-10.39; P = 0.0002], [MD 2.53, 95% CI 1.84-3.46; P < 0.00001]. No significant differences were found in mild and moderate adverse events, while severe cases favored ruxolitinib. Placebo had a significant advantage in any adverse events, with no significant difference in drug-related adverse events. Serious adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. The findings strongly support the efficacy of ruxolitinib therapy in improving various parameters over time for treating vitiligo. However, thorough consideration of its safety profile, particularly concerning adverse events and potential side effects, is warranted. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions.