In-process and post-process strategies for part quality assessment in metal powder bed fusion: A review

Cherq Chua,Yanting Liu,Richard J. Williams,Chee Kai Chua,Swee Leong Sing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.01.004

IF: 12.1

2024-01-31

Journal of Manufacturing Systems

Abstract:An increasing number of metal components processed by additive manufacturing (AM) are now being used in industrial applications. However, in the most demanding applications, where flawless integrity is required, underpinning the quality of parts produced via AM remains a problem. Consequently, significant research activity into quality assessment methods has been conducted in recent years. In this work, the different strategies and methods for quantifying the quality of components produced via metal powder bed fusion (PBF) are reviewed. Both in-process and post-process approaches to quality assessment are considered. In-process quality assessment frameworks are based on in-situ process monitoring techniques. Different approaches are categorized according to the format of the data produced by the sensor, which aspect of quality is being measured and how the assessment is made. Metrics to quantify diagnostic accuracy, the length scale of quality assessment and in-situ repair are also discussed. Post-process methods for quality assessment are examined in the second half of the review. Methods are categorized according to the element of part quality being assessed. Both destructive and non-destructive methods are considered, including the impact on AM build design. Quality metric reporting and length scale, e.g., per build basis, per part basis or sub-regions within parts, will again be reviewed and advantages and disadvantages of post-process methods discussed.

engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science