A crosswalk of commonly used frailty scales
Stephanie Denise M. Sison,Sandra M. Shi,Kyung Moo Kim,Nessa Steinberg,Sohyun Jeong,Ellen P. McCarthy,Dae Hyun Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18453
2023-06-09
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:Background Several validated scales have been developed to measure frailty, yet the direct relationship between these measures and their scores remains unknown. To bridge this gap, we created a crosswalk of the most commonly used frailty scales. Methods We used data from 7070 community‐dwelling older adults who participated in National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 5 to construct a crosswalk among frailty scales. We operationalized the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Index (SOF), FRAIL Scale, Frailty Phenotype, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Vulnerable Elder Survey‐13 (VES‐13), Tilburg Frailty Indictor (TFI), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), and 40‐item Frailty Index (FI). A crosswalk between FI and the frailty scales was created using the equipercentile linking method, a statistical procedure that produces equivalent scoring between scales according to percentile distributions. To demonstrate its validity, we determined the 4‐year mortality risk across all scales for low‐risk (equivalent to FI <0.20), moderate‐risk (FI 0.20 to <0.40), and high‐risk (FI ≥0.40) categories. Results Using NHATS, the feasibility of calculating frailty scores was at least 90% for all nine scales, with the FI having the highest number of calculable scores. Participants considered frail on FI (cutpoint of 0.25) corresponded to the following scores on each frailty measure: SOF 1.3, FRAIL 1.7, Phenotype 1.7, CFS 5.3, VES‐13 5.5, TFI 4.4, GFI 4.8, and EFS 5.8. Conversely, individuals considered frail according to the cutpoint of each frailty measure corresponded to the following FI scores: 0.37 for SOF, 0.40 for FRAIL, 0.42 for Phenotype, 0.21 for CFS, 0.16 for VES‐13, 0.28 for TFI, 0.21 for GFI, and 0.37 for EFS. Across frailty scales, the 4‐year mortality risks between the same categories were similar in magnitude. Conclusion Our results provide clinicians and researchers with a useful tool to directly compare and interpret frailty scores across scales.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology