Potential benefits and possible risks of CGRP-targeted multitherapy in migraine
Keiko Ihara,Tsubasa Takizawa,Narumi Watanabe,Jin Nakahara,Paolo Martelletti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2024.2316131
2024-02-13
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Abstract:KEYWORDS: Migraine, one of the most common headache disorders, with a global prevalence of approximately 14.0% [ Citation 1 ], has been previously treated with conventional and nonspecific treatment. However, since the introduction of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand or receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (i.e. gepants) as acute (e.g. rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant) and preventive (e.g. galcanezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, rimegepant, and atogepant) treatments, the treatment options have dramatically changed. Despite the high cost of anti-CGRP mAbs and gepants, they have proven to be effective and safe in patients with migraine, even in difficult-to-treat cases, such as refractory and resistant migraine [ Citation 2–4 ]. Considering the excellent outcomes of both classes, the use of anti-CGRP mAbs in combination with gepants has recently been reported in multiple case reports and observational studies [ Citation 4 , Citation 5 ] and is considered controversial [ Citation 4 , Citation 6 ]. This editorial aims to review current evidence for the utility of combination therapy and address potential advantages and disadvantages, such as additional risks of adverse events and double blockade of the CGRP pathway, and incremental cost.
pharmacology & pharmacy,biochemistry & molecular biology,toxicology