Leming Shi,Wendell D Jones,Roderick V Jensen,Stephen C Harris,Roger G Perkins,Federico M Goodsaid,Lei Guo,Lisa J Croner,Cecilie Boysen,Hong Fang,Feng Qian,Shashi Amur,Wenjun Bao,Catalin C Barbacioru,Vincent Bertholet,Xiaoxi Megan Cao,Tzu-Ming Chu,Patrick J Collins,Xiao-hui Fan,Felix W Frueh,James C Fuscoe,Xu Guo,Jing Han,Damir Herman,Huixiao Hong,Ernest S Kawasaki,Quan-Zhen Li,Yuling Luo,Yunqing Ma,Nan Mei,Ron L Peterson,Raj K Puri,Richard Shippy,Zhenqiang Su,Yongming Andrew Sun,Hongmei Sun,Brett Thorn,Yaron Turpaz,Charles Wang,Sue Jane Wang,Janet A Warrington,James C Willey,Jie Wu,Qian Xie,Liang Zhang,Lu Zhang,Sheng Zhong,Russell D Wolfinger,Weida Tong

Abstract:Background Reproducibility is a fundamental requirement in scientific experiments. Some recent publications have claimed that microarrays are unreliable because lists of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are not reproducible in similar experiments. Meanwhile, new statistical methods for identifying DEGs continue to appear in the scientific literature. The resultant variety of existing and emerging methods exacerbates confusion and continuing debate in the microarray community on the appropriate choice of methods for identifying reliable DEG lists. Results Using the data sets generated by the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, we investigated the impact on the reproducibility of DEG lists of a few widely used gene selection procedures. We present comprehensive results from inter-site comparisons using the same microarray platform, cross-platform comparisons using multiple microarray platforms, and comparisons between microarray results and those from TaqMan – the widely regarded "standard" gene expression platform. Our results demonstrate that (1) previously reported discordance between DEG lists could simply result from ranking and selecting DEGs solely by statistical significance ( P ) derived from widely used simple t -tests; (2) when fold change (FC) is used as the ranking criterion with a non-stringent P -value cutoff filtering, the DEG lists become much more reproducible, especially when fewer genes are selected as differentially expressed, as is the case in most microarray studies; and (3) the instability of short DEG lists solely based on P -value ranking is an expected mathematical consequence of the high variability of the t -values; the more stringent the P -value threshold, the less reproducible the DEG list is. These observations are also consistent with results from extensive simulation calculations. Conclusion We recommend the use of FC-ranking plus a non-stringent P cutoff as a straightforward and baseline practice in order to generate more reproducible DEG lists. Specifically, the P -value cutoff should not be stringent (too small) and FC should be as large as possible. Our results provide practical guidance to choose the appropriate FC and P -value cutoffs when selecting a given number of DEGs. The FC criterion enhances reproducibility, whereas the P criterion balances sensitivity and specificity.

Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations

Effect of Pooling Samples on the Efficiency of Comparative Studies Using Microarrays.

Power analysis and sample size estimation for RNA-Seq differential expression

Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments

A Gene Selection Method for GeneChip Array Data with Small Sample Sizes

Power and sample size calculations for high-throughput sequencing-based experiments.

Design and power analysis for multi-sample single cell genomics experiments

Optimizing murine sample sizes for RNA-seq studies revealed from large-scale comparative analysis

scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies

A Statistical Framework for the Design of Microarray Experiments and Effective Detection of Differential Gene Expression

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

Statistical methods for analyzing microarray feature data with replications.

A Robust Statistical Procedure to Discover Expression Biomarkers Using Microarray Genomic Expression Data.

Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments

Statistical Power Analysis for Designing Bulk, Single-Cell, and Spatial Transcriptomics Experiments: Review, Tutorial, and Perspectives

Identifying differentially expressed genes in human acute leukemia and mouse brain microarray datasets utilizing QTModel

Investigation of reproducibility of differentially expressed genes in DNA microarrays through statistical simulation

cDNA Microarray Experiment: Design Issues in Early Stage and the Need of Normalization

Biostatistical Considerations of the Use of Genomic DNA Reference in Microarrays.

Sample size and statistical power considerations in high-dimensionality data settings: a comparative study of classification algorithms

The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies