Racial differences and predictors of outcomes in testicular cancer based on the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Eun-mi Yu,Hongkun Wang,Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.503
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:503 Background: The incidence of testicular cancer in the U.S. is highest in white (W) men and lower in black (B), Hispanic (H) and Asian-American men, with reports of increasing trends in Hispanic men with worse outcomes (Li et al., BMC Cancer 2020). We aim to verify the emerging ethnicity variations in a large database. Methods: Using the NCDB database with patient-level data extraction from 2004 to 2020, we sought to identify the incidence, demographics, regional differences, treatment, and outcomes in men who are Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White (NHW) and other races with testicular cancer diagnoses (non-seminoma, NS; seminoma, S) with differences in treatment patterns from different institution types, insurance across regions. Results: There were 81571 pts in all with 46979 S pts W and 34592 NS pts W vs 1754 S pts B and 1106 NS pts B with 5396 S pts H and 5609 NS pts H with other races/unknown for the rest. More S patients were treated at comprehensive community cancer programs (17%) compared to NS pts (6.1%). The majority of patients had Charlson-Deyo Score of 0 (92.7% of S pts and 93.7% of NS pts), had private insurance (74.1% S pts, 69.1% NS pts), though incidence appeared to be similar except for a slight drop in 2020 at 5.9% compared to 6.6% during years 2018 to 2019. Most were diagnosed with Stage I (29.6%) and Stage II and III (16.3%) though it was unknown/missing for 54%. Overall survival (OS) was better for S compared to NS in all pts (p<0.0001), and in stages II & III (p<0.001). OS was better for W vs B (p<0.0001), NHW vs H (p<0.0001), and with differences in Charlson-Deyo score (p <0.0001), facility type (p=0.008) and insurance status (p <0.0001). OS p-values are from Log-rank tests. Conclusions: Our analysis reveals some differences in survival trends with better survival in seminoma compared to non-seminoma, though Blacks and Hispanics have worse outcomes compared to Whites and Non-Hispanic Whites. This highlights the need for targeted efforts to bridge gaps in care.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?