Abstract:Uniformitarian geology has opposed biblical history for over two centuries. Most creationist critiques focus on contrary empirical evidence, but this series pursues a logical and axiomatic critique of the “four-definition” formulation of uniformitarianism. Three of these facets—stasis, gradualism, and generic uniformity—fail to support the concept. The remaining “uniformity of process,” also called actualism, seems on the surface to work well, but can be addressed by seeking justification of its use as an axiom of natural history. Actualism rests on uniformity, and uniformity in turn on causal continuity. These concepts can be evaluated relative to the worldviews of Christianity and Naturalism by the truth test of coherence. Naturalism fails that test, but Christianity passes because causal continuity is coherent with—and only with—Christianity’s God. As a theological issue, uniformity and actualism are best understood as physical expressions of divine providence. Since providence is distinct from God’s acts of creation, actualism is irrelevant to that part of the rock record and its relevance to the Flood depends on the nature of divine action during that event. Introduction Although the term uniformitarianism was not introduced until 1832, the concepts that Lyell so cleverly fused together (Gould 1987) had already been operating in the nascent discipline of geology for some decades (Laudan 1987; Rudwick 2005, 2008). Lyell linked Newton’s method of “actual causes” to a quasi-static directional gradualism, fusing method and historical narrative. In short order, this new concept became the bedrock of the new geology and continued as its fundamental principle until recently. In fact, many practicing geologists continue to affirm it, unaware of its problems. One of the effects of uniformitarian geology was to destroy confidence in the biblical record of origins and early earth history, and the concept of uniformitarianism still stands as a bulwark against today’s Flood geology. Therefore, it is incumbent upon creationists to address uniformitarianism. This can be done in two ways. The most common is to adduce empirical evidence that contradicts uniformitarianism—an approach dating back to Whitcomb and Morris (1961) and still prominent (Oard and Reed 2009; Snelling 2009). The empirical approach has also proven popular on the secular side, as seen in the rise of neocatastrophism (for example, Ager 1973, 1993; Alvarez et al. 1980). The second approach is a logical analysis of the ideas and concepts behind uniformitarianism. Since the 1960s, the intellectuals of the earth sciences have recognized problems in the standard Lyellian formulation and have resolved those problems by following Gould’s (1965) lead in subdividing the term into four discrete definitions (Albritton 1967; Gould 1965, 1975, 1984; Hooykaas 1963, 1970; Rudwick 1971, 1972; Shea 1982). These definitions (fig. 1) and their inability to save the concept are discussed in Reed (2010), and for convenience are summarized here. The strategy of this series is to demonstrate that the concept of uniformitarianism, as presently defined and defended in secular geology, is faulty. The first paper argued that three of the four definitions of uniformitarianism were outmoded, invalid, or irrelevant to geology. Semantic confusion was documented, and a proposed solution offered, in the elimination of a number of redundant terms (fig. 2). This paper will address the final facet of uniformitarianism in more depth and attempt to show that it, too, fails to provide a firm foundation for modern secular geology. Thus, with the failure of all four definitions, uniformitarianism as a whole must be considered invalid unless its advocates can reformulate its meaning. Recap of Part I From 1832 to the 1960s, uniformitarianism was as undefined as it was important, thanks largely to Lyell’s blending ideas about geological method and historical narrative under his principle of actual causes (Gould 1987). Growing concern, perhaps related to the introduction of Flood geology and problems noted by Professor Reijer Hooykaas (1963), stirred leading geologists to address the issue. Consensus solidified around the strategy of Gould, who proposed explicating multiple meanings of uniformitarianism.

Biofilm penetration and disinfection efficacy of alkaline hypochlorite and chlorosulfamates

Comparative evaluation of disinfectant efficacy against biofilm-residing microorganisms

Factors affecting the chemical efficacy of 2% sodium hypochlorite against oral steady‐state dual‐species biofilms: Exposure time and volume application

Antimicrobial activity and effectiveness of a combination of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide in killing and removing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from surfaces

Antimicrobial activity of Chlorhexidine, Peracetic acid and Sodium hypochlorite/etidronate irrigant solutions against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.

Antibacterial Ability of Sodium Hypochlorite Activated with PUI vs. XPF File against Bacteria Growth on Enterococcus faecalis Mature Biofilm

Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of different disinfectants on the biofilm formation in dental unit water systems using dip slide and conventional methods: A pilot study

Controlling Biofilm Growth and Its Antibiotic Resistance in Drinking Water by Combined UV and Chlorination Processes

Effect of shock chlorine and chloramine disinfection on biofilm disinfection in pipe system of secondary water supply

Evaluation of Quatsome Morphology, Composition, and Stability for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Eradication

Comparative susceptibility of planktonic and 3-day-old Salmonella Typhimurium biofilms to disinfectants

Evaluating disinfectant efficacy on mixed biofilms comprising Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli, lactic acid bacteria, and spoilage microorganisms

Surveillance of the behaviour of pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms after ortho-phtalaldehyde disinfection

[Removal effect of disinfection factors in low concentration on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm]

Notes on coherent backscattering from a random potential

Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite in overcoming antimicrobial resistance and eradicating biofilms in clinical pathogens from pressure ulcers

Effectiveness of various chemical disinfectants versus cleaning combined with heat disinfection on Pseudomonas biofilm in hemodialysis machines

Comparative Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Nano-Silver Irrigant, Sodium Hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm

Antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and hyper-pure chlorine dioxide in the depth of dentin tubules in vitro

Untangling Uniformitarianism, Level II: Actualism in Crisis

Is a reduction in viability enough to determine biofilm susceptibility to a biocide?