Incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, outcomes, and biomarkers in de novo late acute GVHD

Yu Akahoshi,Nikolaos Spyrou,William J Hogan,Francis Ayuketang Ayuk,Zachariah DeFilipp,Daniela Weber,Hannah K Choe,Elizabeth O. Hexner,Wolf Rösler,Aaron M. Etra,Karamjeet Singh Sandhu,Gregory A Yanik,Chantiya Chanswangphuwana,Carrie L. Kitko,Ran Reshef,Sabrina Kraus,Matthias Wölfl,Matthias Eder,Hannah Bertrand,Muna Qayed,Pietro Merli,Stephan A. Grupp,Paibel Aguayo-Hiraldo,Tal Schechter,Evelyn Ullrich,Janna Baez,Rahnuma Beheshti,Sigrun Gleich,Steven Kowalyk,George Morales,Rachel Young,Deukwoo Kwon,Ryotaro Nakamura,John E Levine,James L.M. Ferrara,Yi-Bin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009885
IF: 7.642
2023-06-17
Blood Advances
Abstract:Late acute GVHD is defined as de novo acute GVHD presenting beyond 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without manifestations of chronic GVHD. Data are limited regarding its characteristics, clinical course, and risk factors due to under recognition and changes in classification. We evaluated 3542 consecutive adult recipients of their first HCT at twenty-four Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) centers between January 2014 and August 2021 to better describe the clinical evolution and outcomes of late acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of classic acute GVHD that required systemic treatment was 35.2% and an additional 5.7% of patients required treatment for late acute GVHD. At the onset of symptoms, late acute GVHD was more severe than classic acute GVHD by both clinical and MAGIC Algorithm Probability (MAP) biomarker parameters, and showed a lower overall response rate at day 28. Both clinical and biomarker grading at the time of treatment stratified the risk of NRM in patients with classic and late acute GVHD, respectively, but long-term NRM and OS did not differ between patients with classic and late acute GVHD. Advanced age, female to male sex mismatch, and the use of reduced intensity conditioning were associated with development of late acute GVHD, whereas use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based GVHD prevention was protective mainly due to shifts in GVHD timing. As overall outcomes were comparable, our findings, while not definitive, suggest that similar treatment strategies, including eligibility for clinical trials, based solely on clinical presentation at onset are appropriate.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?