Abstract:As the number of models in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) archives increase from generation to generation, there is a pressing need for guidance on how to interpret and best use the abundance of newly available climate information. Users of the latest CMIP6 seeking to draw conclusions about model agreement must contend with an "ensemble of opportunity" containing similar models that appear under different names. Those who used the previous CMIP5 as a basis for downstream applications must filter through hundreds of new CMIP6 simulations to find several best suited to their region, season, and climate horizon of interest. Here we present methods to address both issues, model dependence and model subselection, to help users previously anchored in CMIP5 to navigate CMIP6 and multi-model ensembles in general. In Part I, we refine a definition of model dependence based on climate output, initially employed in Climate model Weighting by Independence and Performance (ClimWIP), to designate discrete model families within CMIP5 and CMIP6. We show that the increased presence of model families in CMIP6 bolsters the upper mode of the ensemble's bimodal effective equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) distribution. Accounting for the mismatch in representation between model families and individual model runs shifts the CMIP6 ECS median and 75th percentile down by 0.43 ∘ C, achieving better alignment with CMIP5's ECS distribution. In Part II, we present a new approach to model subselection based on cost function minimization, Climate model Selection by Independence, Performance, and Spread (ClimSIPS). ClimSIPS selects sets of CMIP models based on the relative importance a user ascribes to model independence (as defined in Part I), model performance, and ensemble spread in projected climate outcome. We demonstrate ClimSIPS by selecting sets of three to five models from CMIP6 for European applications, evaluating the performance from the agreement with the observed mean climate and the spread in outcome from the projected mid-century change in surface air temperature and precipitation. To accommodate different use cases, we explore two ways to represent models with multiple members in ClimSIPS, first, by ensemble mean and, second, by an individual ensemble member that maximizes mid-century change diversity within the CMIP overall. Because different combinations of models are selected by the cost function for different balances of independence, performance, and spread priority, we present all selected subsets in ternary contour "subselection triangles" and guide users with recommendations based on further qualitative selection standards. ClimSIPS represents a novel framework to select models in an informed, efficient, and transparent manner and addresses the growing need for guidance and simple tools, so those seeking climate services can navigate the increasingly complex CMIP landscape.

Improving Earth System Model Selection Methodologies for Projecting Hydroclimatic Change: Case Study in the Pacific Northwest

Uncertainty-informed selection of CMIP6 Earth system model subsets for use in multisectoral and impact models

Prioritizing the selection of CMIP6 model ensemble members for downscaling projections of CONUS temperature and precipitation

Performance evaluation of CMIP6 models for application to hydrological modelling studies – A case study of Australia

Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 Model Simulations for the Asian-Pacific Region: Perspectives from Multiple Dimensions

A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for ranking the performance of CMIP6 models in reproducing precipitation patterns over Abaya-Chamo sub-basin, Ethiopia

Climate model Selection by Independence, Performance, and Spread (ClimSIPS v1.0.1) for regional applications

Customized Statistically Downscaled CMIP5 and CMIP6 Projections: Application in the Edwards Aquifer Region in South‐Central Texas

Quantification of The Performance of CMIP6 Models for Dynamic Downscaling in The North Pacific and Northwest Pacific Oceans

Evapotranspiration Simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Characteristics with a Comprehensive Ensemble of Independent Datasets

Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs over the CONUS for downscaling studies

CERESMIP: a climate modeling protocol to investigate recent trends in the Earth's Energy Imbalance

Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations and future climate change projections in the Baro River Basin

Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation Over the United States, Central America, and the Caribbean in CMIP6 GCMs

Finer resolutions and targeted process representations in earth systems models improve hydrologic projections and hydroclimate impacts

Selection of representative general circulation models under climatic uncertainty forWestern North America

Climate change multi-model projections in CMIP6 scenarios in Central Hokkaido, Japan

Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – diagnostics for emergent constraints and future projections from Earth system models in CMIP

Evaluation of CMIP6 model performances in simulating fire weather spatiotemporal variability on global and regional scales

Multi-criteria evaluation of CMIP5 GCMs for climate change impact analysis

Taking climate model evaluation to the next level