Abdominal muscle activation: An EMG study of the Sahrmann five-level core stability test

Ebby Waqqash Mohamad Chan,Eliza Hafiz,Mohamad Shariff A. Hamid,Ali Md. Nadzalan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013702520500080
2020-03-10
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Abstract:Background: Sahrmann five-level core stability test protocol has been used to evaluate the ability of the core muscles to stabilize the spine. However, validation studies on the Sahrmann protocol are limited. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the different levels of Sahrmann five-level core stability (levels 1–5) on the muscle activity of rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), and transverse abdominis/internal oblique (TrA/IO). Methods: Twenty-two asymptomatic male participants aged 21.3[Formula: see text].59 years were recruited. Participants were instructed to perform maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and five levels of Sahrmann five-level core stability test guided with a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU). The surface electromyography (EMG) data of each muscle during five levels of Sahrmann five-level core stability test were normalized as a percentage of MVC. Results: Results showed significant differences in the normalized EMGs of RA [[Formula: see text](4) = 64.80, [Formula: see text].001], EO [[Formula: see text](4) = 58.11, [Formula: see text].001], and TrA/IO [[Formula: see text](4) = 56.00, [Formula: see text].001] between the five levels of Sahrmann five-level core stability test. Post-hoc analysis revealed Sahrmann levels 5 and 3 have significantly higher abdominal EMG signals than levels 4, 2, and 1 ([Formula: see text].001). Conclusion: In conclusion, the Sahrmann five-level core stability test differs according to the level of Sahrmann tests. Significantly higher abdominal muscle activities were observed during levels 3 and 5. Therefore, the classification exchange in levels 3 and 4 of the Sahrmann five-level core stability test should be reconsidered in the future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?