Petrogenesis of the Xingluokeng W-bearing granitic stock, western Fujian Province, SE China and its genetic link to W mineralization

Hui Wang,Chengyou Feng,Rongxi Li,Chao Zhao,Peng Liu,Guanghua Wang,Yujie Hao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.103987

IF: 3.3

2021-05-01

Ore Geology Reviews

Abstract:<p>The Xingluokeng deposit is the largest tungsten deposit discovered in the Wuyi metallogenic belt, with 30.43 Mt WO₃ reserves averaging at 0.23%. The main orebody mainly occurs in an altered granitic stock, comprising veinlet-disseminated and vein-type scheelite and wolframite mineralization. A comprehensive study of field investigations with whole-rock and in-situ geochemical and isotopic compositions was conducted on different intrusive phases of the Xingluokeng ore-bearing granitic stock, aiming to constrain the petrogenesis and its genetic link to W mineralization. The Xingluokeng stock is mainly composed of the porphyritic biotite granite (G1) as the upper part of the stock, intruded by the medium- to fine-grained biotite granite (G2) in the deep. Petrographic observations suggest that the stock experienced intense fractional crystallization as well as assimilation of country rocks close to stock margins. Zircon U−Pb geochronology and trace element analyses indicate that G1 and G2 were emplaced coevally at ∼152 Ma at a relatively lower oxygen fugacity condition (Ce⁴⁺/Ce³⁺ = 44 ± 18 for G1, and 89 ± 36 for G2). Ti-in-zircon thermometer and Al^T-in-biotite geobarometer reveal average crystallization temperature and depth at 762 ℃−740 ℃ and 7.3−7.0 km, respectively. Geochemically, obvious negative correlation between SiO₂ and P₂O₅ and low A/CNK values (mostly &lt;1.1) indicate that they belong to the weakly peraluminous I-type granite, rather than S-type granite as proposed previously. Whole-rock geochemical compositions from G1 to G2 display systematic variations, with a general decrease in major oxides (such as Al₂O₃, TiO₂, FeO^T, MgO, CaO) and Zr/Hf ratio, but a gradual increase in DI value, Rb/Sr ratio and δEu with increasing SiO₂, suggesting fractional crystallization is the major factor that controls the compositional variations between G1 and G2. They have consistent initial ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios of 0.71170 to 0.71477 and ε_Nd(t) values of −12.5 to −10.8, as well as zircon ε_Hf(t) values of −17.4 to −9.2 with Paleoproterozoic Nd−Hf model ages (1783−2081 Ma), suggesting a mixed crustal source of about 88% Paleoproterozoic meta-basaltic rocks and about 22% Paleoproterozoic gneissic granites, with minor assimilation of country rocks. These results favor that the Xingluokeng granites were formed by co-magmatic evolution via K-feldspar-dominated fractionation. High degrees of fractional crystallization have immensely enriched W in reduced magma, then intensive fluid-rock interaction liberated Ca from the G1 to form the scheelite and some Fe might come from the country rocks (biotite hornfels) to precipitate the wolframite.</p>

mineralogy,geology,mining & mineral processing