Abstract:Estimates of climate change remain uncertain—hampering strategic decision making in many sectors. In large part this uncertainty arises from uncertainty in the computational representation of known physical processes. This model component of climate change uncertainty is increasingly being assessed using perturbed model experiments. Some such model perturbations have, for example, led to headline global warming estimates of as much as 12 °C. These experiments consider many differently perturbed versions of a given base model and assess the likelihood of each perturbed model's climate prediction based on how well it simulates present‐day climate. In these experiments, the computational cost of the model assessment is extremely high unless one assumes that the climate anomalies associated with different model perturbations can be combined linearly. Here we demonstrate a different method, which harnesses the power of the data assimilation system to assess directly the perturbed physics of a model. Data assimilation involves the incorporation of daily observations to produce initial conditions (analyses) for numerical weather prediction (NWP). The method used here quantifies systematic initial tendencies in the first few time steps of a model forecast. After suitable temporal averaging, these initial tendencies imply systematic imbalances in the physical processes associated with model error. We show how these tendencies can be used to produce probability weightings for each model that could be used in the construction of probability distribution functions of climate change. The approach typically costs 5% of the cost of a 100‐year coupled model simulation that might otherwise be used to assess the simulation of present‐day climate. Importantly, since the approach is amenable to linear analysis, it could further reduce the cost of model assessment by several orders of magnitude: making the exercise computationally feasible. The initial tendency approach can only assess ‘fast physics’ perturbations, i.e. perturbations that have an impact on weather forecasts as well as climate. However, recent publications suggest that most of the present model parameter uncertainty is associated with fast physics. If such a test were adopted, assessment of the ability to simulate present‐day climate would then only be required for models that ‘pass’ the fast physics test. The study highlights the advantages of a more seamless approach to forecasting that combines NWP, climate forecasting, and all scales in‐between. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

Revisiting two-layer energy balance models for climate assessment

Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations

Reducing climate model biases by exploring parameter space with large ensembles of climate model simulations and statistical emulation

Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models

Quantifying uncertainty in climate projections with conformal ensembles

Emergent constraints on climate sensitivities

Ensemble-Based Parameter Estimation in a Coupled General Circulation Model

Evaluation of simulated responses to climate forcings: a flexible statistical framework using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling – Part 1: Theory

Exploiting large ensembles for a better yet simpler climate model evaluation

On Constraining Projections of Future Climate Using Observations and Simulations From Multiple Climate Models

Coexchangeable Process Modeling for Uncertainty Quantification in Joint Climate Reconstruction

Probability-Weighted Ensembles of U.S. County-Level Climate Projections for Climate Risk Analysis

Taking climate model evaluation to the next level

Sequential learning of climate change via a physical-parameter-based state-space model and Bayesian inference

Uncertainty-informed selection of CMIP6 Earth system model subsets for use in multisectoral and impact models

A Method for Investigating the Relative Importance of Three Components in Overall Uncertainty of Climate Projections

User-tailored sub-selection of climate model ensemble members for impact studies

An Improved Method of the Globally Resolved Energy Balance Model by the Bayes Network

Physics-guided probabilistic modeling of extreme precipitation under climate change

Further Insights on the Role of Accurate State Estimation in Coupled Model Parameter Estimation by a Simple Climate Model Study

Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon